不知「步步友」贏完冠軍一哩賽之後會加幾多分？總之在場的澳洲朋友已認定此駒是另一匹Phar Lap，對我在贏完香港一哩賽時形容為比「重疊」更出色的論據，完全認同。
看來安妮女皇錦標應是牠今季最後目標，正好圓了大摩及馬主李醫生的皇家雅士谷夢。目前世界上還未有一匹一哩馬能考驗到「步步友」的真正實力有多少，而最近連勝五仗的「經濟學家」儘管贏杜拜草地大賽，但其實該役只是牠第一場一級賽，就算贏得遠，國際評分還不及「步步友」之餘，當然與上屆馬王「一路通」的一三零也大有距離。加上「經濟學家」千八二千比一哩出色，以正常發揮，不可能是「步步友」的對手，除非前者有意外又作別論。
大家週末看過英國一二千堅尼盟主的走勢，也看過肯塔基打比盟主「美國法魯」的情況，相信也同意目標這些所謂經典賽盟主，評分也不可能及「步步友」。
所以香港可以Keep住世界馬王金腰帶起碼到皇家雅士谷前！
You are absolutely correct. By supporting a lot (as much as possible)
One can ascertain that one will achieve some kind of relative response depending on how co incidental the responsive data is to the attention. If the optimal supportive motivation is relative to the foundation (wether valid or not) a supportive return will follow.
Accuracy is the issue. This is an hypothetical deduction (not quite as comprehensive as educational requirements are about here in North America) but by any of the individuals motive intelligence. Linguistics and vocabulary play the most important part of communication. Gaps of data in verbal communication only provide confusion.
To express anything at all one must work untill one can say what one means in its entirety otherwise one will express a peer groups distrust and desire to avoid the issue. The bottom line is to study practical, basic, fundemental, primary, ground level technicalities of domestic level to know for sure one is known for sure and this aspect goes far and beyond the experience of the
marriage relationship which is considered by most the most complete education for the poor. From your good friend Bruce K. Paxton
