一代經濟學和數學大師約翰納殊，由精神病陰影走出來，以超高智慧創出舉世無雙的博奕論。如今居然不幸死於一場不應發生的車禍，實在遺憾。
自己在讀大學時代，曾經讀過戰略研究一科，當中博奕論是其中一個課題，也是考試其中一條題目，對納殊教授的著作印象猶新。
天才往往性格很特別，納殊教授一生也是活在自己的小天地，但正因這種專注，很多尖端的問題也迎刃而解。
如非納殊教授臨時決定坐早一班機，抵美後租車公司說他來早了無法安排，他根本就不會坐的士。冥冥中上天要納殊教授將最尖端的學問告訴我們，卻又在這樣的巧合下帶回天庭！八十六歲不錯已是高壽，但近年他思路仍然清晰，再延伸知識領域，仍綽綽有餘。
他的著作有時要看幾次才明白，但多看幾次，瞭解又自然更深。
自己是喜歡下棋和遊戲的人，所以對博奕論是十分有偏愛。
You are absolutely correct. By supporting a lot (as much as possible)
One can ascertain that one will achieve some kind of relative response depending on how co incidental the responsive data is to the attention. If the optimal supportive motivation is relative to the foundation (wether valid or not) a supportive return will follow.
Accuracy is the issue. This is an hypothetical deduction (not quite as comprehensive as educational requirements are about here in North America) but by any of the individuals motive intelligence. Linguistics and vocabulary play the most important part of communication. Gaps of data in verbal communication only provide confusion.
To express anything at all one must work untill one can say what one means in its entirety otherwise one will express a peer groups distrust and desire to avoid the issue. The bottom line is to study practical, basic, fundemental, primary, ground level technicalities of domestic level to know for sure one is known for sure and this aspect goes far and beyond the experience of the
marriage relationship which is considered by most the most complete education for the poor. From your good friend Bruce K. Paxton
