雅士谷，魅力沒法擋。
我說的不是博彩及設施，因為香港這兩方面比他們強得多。
香港的是賽馬魅力。
假如特首甚至國家領導人，在草地出巡，有這麼多群眾自發地，我說的是來自內心自發地，走到欄邊歡呼拍掌，奏起國歌時一起脫帽致敬嗎？
而當特首或國家領導人移玉去沙圈落車時，沙圈又會否逼滿人群，為他們歡呼及拍照？
這是英女皇能做得到，而香港特首做不到，就是「親和力」，就是這三個字。
皇室使納稅人的錢，一年達天文數字，女皇收入又不用交稅。換轉在現在的香港？日日示威都似。但為何英國群眾使了咁多錢，一樣也拍爛手掌，是因為皇室為他們帶來面子和氣度，這是別國沒有的。
我不是支持皇室女帝制，但一個國家要締造他們的大國形象，領導人和班子行出來的氣魂，一定要有威嚴之餘，亦要親民！
You are absolutely correct. By supporting a lot (as much as possible)
One can ascertain that one will achieve some kind of relative response depending on how co incidental the responsive data is to the attention. If the optimal supportive motivation is relative to the foundation (wether valid or not) a supportive return will follow.
Accuracy is the issue. This is an hypothetical deduction (not quite as comprehensive as educational requirements are about here in North America) but by any of the individuals motive intelligence. Linguistics and vocabulary play the most important part of communication. Gaps of data in verbal communication only provide confusion.
To express anything at all one must work untill one can say what one means in its entirety otherwise one will express a peer groups distrust and desire to avoid the issue. The bottom line is to study practical, basic, fundemental, primary, ground level technicalities of domestic level to know for sure one is known for sure and this aspect goes far and beyond the experience of the
marriage relationship which is considered by most the most complete education for the poor. From your good friend Bruce K. Paxton
