不妨將今次在倫敦的體驗與自稱「勇武」的本土派分享。
香港不是要超越倫敦及紐約嗎？香港不是國際大都會嗎？
先看看現在倫敦市的現狀︰於地鐵的某卡車廂裏，你左邊是南亞裔家庭，右邊是非洲裔戴耳筒唱Rap歌的人；站在企位的是一對說西班牙文的夫婦，而在車廂尾拿着行李箱的，則是北歐的背囊客。倫敦本土英語瑯瑯上口的人呢？一概欠奉。
再看看合法外圍投注站︰亞裔人士到處充斥，東歐裔的亦不少，還有貌似建築工人，英語帶濃厚波蘭或羅馬尼亞口音的男士。
酒店管房是東歐或北歐裔，侍應是南亞及葡西，經理則是瑞士或法國。
那麼英國倫敦有無本土派驅蝗，示威反對其他膚色人種呢？又有無人阻大媽跳舞呢？你們見過世面，就知道地鐵吹色士風或彈結他收過路錢的人，又或街頭藝者，比比皆是。
放眼看世界吧！甚麼是海闊天空，不是單單舞龍獅旗，自欺欺人而得到的！
You are absolutely correct. By supporting a lot (as much as possible)
One can ascertain that one will achieve some kind of relative response depending on how co incidental the responsive data is to the attention. If the optimal supportive motivation is relative to the foundation (wether valid or not) a supportive return will follow.
Accuracy is the issue. This is an hypothetical deduction (not quite as comprehensive as educational requirements are about here in North America) but by any of the individuals motive intelligence. Linguistics and vocabulary play the most important part of communication. Gaps of data in verbal communication only provide confusion.
To express anything at all one must work untill one can say what one means in its entirety otherwise one will express a peer groups distrust and desire to avoid the issue. The bottom line is to study practical, basic, fundemental, primary, ground level technicalities of domestic level to know for sure one is known for sure and this aspect goes far and beyond the experience of the
marriage relationship which is considered by most the most complete education for the poor. From your good friend Bruce K. Paxton
