You are absolutely correct. By supporting a lot (as much as possible)
One can ascertain that one will achieve some kind of relative response depending on how co incidental the responsive data is to the attention. If the optimal supportive motivation is relative to the foundation (wether valid or not) a supportive return will follow.
Accuracy is the issue. This is an hypothetical deduction (not quite as comprehensive as educational requirements are about here in North America) but by any of the individuals motive intelligence. Linguistics and vocabulary play the most important part of communication. Gaps of data in verbal communication only provide confusion.
To express anything at all one must work untill one can say what one means in its entirety otherwise one will express a peer groups distrust and desire to avoid the issue. The bottom line is to study practical, basic, fundemental, primary, ground level technicalities of domestic level to know for sure one is known for sure and this aspect goes far and beyond the experience of the
marriage relationship which is considered by most the most complete education for the poor. From your good friend Bruce K. Paxton
obama,
你啲英文幾好喎，講得都好啱。網上…我就是喜歡這樣^o^
你不欣賞嗎?佢[amy gutmann]啲野唔啱我.亦唔會當佢係洋菩薩?
我喜歡睇毛澤東文選.
uturn
吳嵩is navy....
but u turn also navy....
pls read more.....
an article by amy gutmann
"the lure and dangers of extremist rhetoric"
香港就冇得退出，但香港人可以杯葛/示威/抗議。
去表達一個香港人不喜歡的講馬佬........沾污[奧運精神]。
http://hk.youtube.com/watch?v=yWyi7G9tf1Y&feature=related
關公也有對頭人，吳大俠是說自己呀。下邊的兩位不就是對頭人嗎?
有對頭人才好呀，有批評才有進步呀，不是嗎?吳嵩。
不參與!
就叫關公也有對頭人?
當年[蘇軍入侵阿富汗]亦有很多國家退出及不參與.
退出總有理由.吳生認為十分罕見的理由[炎熱].
正是人家重視此要點.如果中東搵你做,
可能你話:在沙漠辦盛裝舞步賽事都冇問題!
吳生,醒小小好唔好?
瑞士精神果然過人!!
瑞士首席選手退出盛裝舞步賽事，領隊繼而將其餘隊友退出。該隊教練決定確有團隊精神。
全球最備受尊重的英國馬術協會立即表示香港無問題，但並無話你吳嵩無問題。亦表示香港協辦○八奧運馬術絕對適合。但由你吳嵩作評述就絕對不適合!相信香港普羅馬迷會普遍支持瑞士隊的決定。