說自由民主，香港還比不上日本，但近日自由民主的國家對講手提電話擾民，都不約而同地作出規範，不妨在本欄與大家分享。
香港馬場手電解禁只是近年的事，但馬場餐廳及馬會會所仍是禁用手機，其主要原因是想食客們不會受到外來的騷擾。日本的機場巴士，是禁止使用手機的，理由亦是希望搭客不會受到騷擾，這也未算，我去銀座用膳，有不少餐廳也放了禁用手機的牌在檯上，一如禁煙牌一樣，就算是大酒吧，笑語喧天，嘈到可能電話都聽唔到，亦有可能會禁用手機。
到了晚上打開電視看CNN，原來不止日本，連歐洲國家如捷克也考慮搭公車不能講電話。這對香港這個幾乎每人也有手機，分分秒秒無所不談的地方，應行不通。因為若食肆內不能講電話，搭車不能講電話，大家唔嘈到拆天才怪。
唔係話香港有此情況唔啱，但世界潮流是走向大同，不以自我為中心。別人在你附近不停談話，你不用是「巴士阿叔」也會覺得討厭，卻無法宣泄。如今歐洲部分國家及日本已逐步走向不自私自我途徑，我不是說香港需要立即跟隨，但這個做法值得大家仔細玩味。
You are absolutely correct. By supporting a lot (as much as possible)
One can ascertain that one will achieve some kind of relative response depending on how co incidental the responsive data is to the attention. If the optimal supportive motivation is relative to the foundation (wether valid or not) a supportive return will follow.
Accuracy is the issue. This is an hypothetical deduction (not quite as comprehensive as educational requirements are about here in North America) but by any of the individuals motive intelligence. Linguistics and vocabulary play the most important part of communication. Gaps of data in verbal communication only provide confusion.
To express anything at all one must work untill one can say what one means in its entirety otherwise one will express a peer groups distrust and desire to avoid the issue. The bottom line is to study practical, basic, fundemental, primary, ground level technicalities of domestic level to know for sure one is known for sure and this aspect goes far and beyond the experience of the
marriage relationship which is considered by most the most complete education for the poor. From your good friend Bruce K. Paxton
這做法如在香港實行, 實在有點苛刻 , 不過我覺得香港到底還是會跟這大潮流 , 原因好簡單 , 香港高官有幾可使用公共交通工具 , 而出入慣的高級會所 , 根本已有很多是禁止使用手機 , 他們根本不覺在餐廳/酒吧等公共場使禁止使用手機會帶來什麼影響 !
雖然如此, 我也會贊成這做法, 因我也經常受到這問題的騷擾 ! 最特別亦是最討厭的 , 莫過於在電話中爆粗的人士 , 其次就是在公共場所玩手機鈴聲的那類, 大佬, 你選手機鈴聲係ok, 不過細聲d 得唔得 !
唔俾講電話都係好㗎。
最驚啲的士同小巴司機, 揸緊車猛講電話, 做乘客就好驚！