明明肉眼見到公眾看台在三項賽最後一天的場地障礙賽幾乎爆場，以為入座有一萬八千人(最高入場人數)，怎料最後官方公布數字仍為一萬二千人左右。當然頭兩天部分傳媒以一千及萬二的數字就「砌」馬術公司，話奧馬少人睇兼悶，但原來真正的情況與他們「想像」的大有不同。
公眾席不錯是坐滿，但奧運大家庭及貴賓席裡，原來有部分尊貴的議員和貴賓無到場，而可容納三千人的傳媒看台，不少座位空空如也，而且有好幾行預留給指定傳媒的有蓋座位，亦全場都無人坐。還有，一萬八千是全場總人數，這包括選手和職員等走動人士。萬一萬二只是付了錢的觀眾，已是多得很！
咁馬術公司就被人鬧得好冤枉喇！
明明係傳媒(包括外國)及部分VIP請都唔到，就向馬術公司扣帽子話香港公眾不歡迎馬術。周二晚公眾席坐無虛席的情景我已拍下來，這只是賽事的第四天情況，相信到了最後幾天，會更上一層樓，而頒獎的那兩天相信VIP大部分也會自動蒲頭證明自己存在。唔知到時會唔會多啲傳媒呢？
You are absolutely correct. By supporting a lot (as much as possible)
One can ascertain that one will achieve some kind of relative response depending on how co incidental the responsive data is to the attention. If the optimal supportive motivation is relative to the foundation (wether valid or not) a supportive return will follow.
Accuracy is the issue. This is an hypothetical deduction (not quite as comprehensive as educational requirements are about here in North America) but by any of the individuals motive intelligence. Linguistics and vocabulary play the most important part of communication. Gaps of data in verbal communication only provide confusion.
To express anything at all one must work untill one can say what one means in its entirety otherwise one will express a peer groups distrust and desire to avoid the issue. The bottom line is to study practical, basic, fundemental, primary, ground level technicalities of domestic level to know for sure one is known for sure and this aspect goes far and beyond the experience of the
marriage relationship which is considered by most the most complete education for the poor. From your good friend Bruce K. Paxton
大局已定, 中國第一 !
http://www.hkheadline.com/blog/reply_blog_edit.asp?f=SCJYHEB5PV54662&id=129897