黃毓民曾執教多年，我未上過佢堂，未知他上課風格如何，但老師向學生掟粉筆掟粉刷，我做學生時也有見過。
當時是上法律課，外籍講師見某同學不聽書在望窗外遊魂，就將粉刷飛過去並擲中該同學。這種行為是對是錯，自有公論。
從毓民送學生證給特首之舉，似乎與掟蕉頗有關連，毓民根本當特首是自己學生，如學生冥頑不靈，掟蕉等於掟粉筆粉刷，作為不滿該學生行為。
毓民有無尊重議會制度，留待他的同僚俾意見，但我覺得掟蕉是形式上一個下馬威，向特首及政府官員宣示未來四年他們不會輕易過關。是蕉、是橙，掟中或不中(我相信是刻意掟不中)，大家不必執着。
每人有每人表達意見方式，固然我反對用暴力，但毓民、長毛等舉動距離暴力兩個字很遠。議會雖然應是嚴肅議政地方，但無傷大雅得啖笑，搞點先氣氛，有時亦無所謂；但「掟蕉」及走出座位質詢的行為，主席可依從議事規則去做適當之事。一方能表達不滿，另一方可趕他們出議事堂，二者各得其所，看倌也睇得過癮，總之最緊要是無人受傷。
You are absolutely correct. By supporting a lot (as much as possible)
One can ascertain that one will achieve some kind of relative response depending on how co incidental the responsive data is to the attention. If the optimal supportive motivation is relative to the foundation (wether valid or not) a supportive return will follow.
Accuracy is the issue. This is an hypothetical deduction (not quite as comprehensive as educational requirements are about here in North America) but by any of the individuals motive intelligence. Linguistics and vocabulary play the most important part of communication. Gaps of data in verbal communication only provide confusion.
To express anything at all one must work untill one can say what one means in its entirety otherwise one will express a peer groups distrust and desire to avoid the issue. The bottom line is to study practical, basic, fundemental, primary, ground level technicalities of domestic level to know for sure one is known for sure and this aspect goes far and beyond the experience of the
marriage relationship which is considered by most the most complete education for the poor. From your good friend Bruce K. Paxton
ATV 節目上, 毓民表明掟蕉係抗爭姿態, 並非掟曾特首：
也文也武一大班 社民連的激進與憤怒 Part 1 / 5
http://hk.youtube.com/watch?v=xB6Buop3ZuQ
也文也武一大班 社民連的激進與憤怒 Part 2 / 5
http://hk.youtube.com/watch?v=4oA7X_xF9Lo
也文也武一大班 社民連的激進與憤怒 Part 3 / 5
http://hk.youtube.com/watch?v=8K08YMVMiQk
也文也武一大班 社民連的激進與憤怒 Part 4 / 5
http://hk.youtube.com/watch?v=Lsw2e7iJ9XM
也文也武一大班 社民連的激進與憤怒 Part 5 / 5
http://hk.youtube.com/watch?v=xIatzpJR5pQ
we tax payers pay these ppl to disturb the meeting and then let them go away the meeting hall to enjoy afternoon tea ?
they know to play this game well... with the support on 9 ppl... thats why we are in such chaotic situation.
shame on u
如果這個議會是嚴肅議政的地方, 為何容易班官係度帶議員遊花園?
唔係應該一五一實, 實話實說咩?
毓民, 下次丟蛋啦!!! 臭果種喎!!! 支持你!