自己已接近三十年未去過泰國，而內子曾於八月到彼邦開會，剛巧遇上泰國人民佔領布吉機場事件，因為機場封閉因而無法返港，結果公司要包車由布吉星夜「逃難」趕到曼谷上機，沿途也是驚險萬分，一來怕交通意外，二來怕山賊，十個小時車程不敢睡覺。今次港人被困曼谷，剛好就像上次布吉的相反方向版本。
我經歷過倫敦地鐵大爆炸的一天，撿回性命已算萬幸，對一場賽事的得失已睇得很化。但有此經歷後，學懂的第一件事是珍惜眼前一切機遇和所有人物，所以近年我比過往飛得更多更頻密，就是不想錯過每一個睇好馬的機會。
周日的香港拍賣會試跑，當然不容錯過，在此無必要錦上添花地神化拍賣會的馬匹，事實上每年全世界先進賽馬國家最頂尖的拍賣會也必有佳駟，也一定有下駟，這是個自然定律，因為就算馬兒型格幾靚，血統幾好，都像女孩一樣，我們也無法猜透他們的「心」。
You are absolutely correct. By supporting a lot (as much as possible)
One can ascertain that one will achieve some kind of relative response depending on how co incidental the responsive data is to the attention. If the optimal supportive motivation is relative to the foundation (wether valid or not) a supportive return will follow.
Accuracy is the issue. This is an hypothetical deduction (not quite as comprehensive as educational requirements are about here in North America) but by any of the individuals motive intelligence. Linguistics and vocabulary play the most important part of communication. Gaps of data in verbal communication only provide confusion.
To express anything at all one must work untill one can say what one means in its entirety otherwise one will express a peer groups distrust and desire to avoid the issue. The bottom line is to study practical, basic, fundemental, primary, ground level technicalities of domestic level to know for sure one is known for sure and this aspect goes far and beyond the experience of the
marriage relationship which is considered by most the most complete education for the poor. From your good friend Bruce K. Paxton
UM~~TOTALLY AGREE!