劉璇是前國寶級運動員，贏過奧運金牌。
劉璇外號「璇美人」，樣子甜美嬌嫡嫡，惹人喜愛，形象健康。
劉璇已植根香港，甚至在多個演藝場合出現表演。
不知道今次劉璇做打比代言人有無收錢？記憶中過往許多紅星都義助馬會，分文不取。
以上條件完全符合的話，普羅公關大哥大姐很難抗拒不請劉璇。
但業界和馬迷又點睇呢？似乎發聲的人不多。不過從我接觸到的馬主、馬會會員和馬迷，歸納到他們以下意見：劉璇的廣東話多年也進步不大，在電視叫打吡宣傳口號根本聽也聽不清楚；劉璇的形象，與馬圈格格不入，而且她已退役多年，明星效應有幾大？得到市民支持和認同嗎？而請劉璇訪問馬圈中人更搞笑，她講普通話，華人騎師講廣東話，西人騎師講英文，觀眾看來是背稿，而全無溝通交流。
以上各段不是我的意見：我對劉璇做代言人意見中立，但一如其他時事一線主持人，為求公正不偏不倚，正反兩方意見一定要詳細披露，以正視聽。
You are absolutely correct. By supporting a lot (as much as possible)
One can ascertain that one will achieve some kind of relative response depending on how co incidental the responsive data is to the attention. If the optimal supportive motivation is relative to the foundation (wether valid or not) a supportive return will follow.
Accuracy is the issue. This is an hypothetical deduction (not quite as comprehensive as educational requirements are about here in North America) but by any of the individuals motive intelligence. Linguistics and vocabulary play the most important part of communication. Gaps of data in verbal communication only provide confusion.
To express anything at all one must work untill one can say what one means in its entirety otherwise one will express a peer groups distrust and desire to avoid the issue. The bottom line is to study practical, basic, fundemental, primary, ground level technicalities of domestic level to know for sure one is known for sure and this aspect goes far and beyond the experience of the
marriage relationship which is considered by most the most complete education for the poor. From your good friend Bruce K. Paxton
難得可以同意的一次, 確實馬會的巿場部門, 對掌握 '民意' 所在, 似乎同政府一樣咁無知同天真, 搞太多無謂的宣傳, 而且觸不及癢處. 浪費金錢而無實效.
幾時跑馬似番跑馬呢?