前周一有傳媒報導羅傑承籌辦港職聯一事(其實這計畫早已籌備多時，而據悉亦有球評人大力協助)，而不只一個傳媒引述他的意見謂若港職聯搞不成，而南華又未能打入亞協盃八強，他「沒有心機再搞波」。
我不打算評論上述的言論，不善忘的球迷相信記得上屆羅傑承選足總執委，結果落敗而回。而七月份足總大選，結果如何相信對港職聯搞不搞得成頗有關係。
有港職聯能否立即將足球水準大幅提升，我頗有保留。固然我們不喜歡見到像幾年前般甲組搞波得番幾隊，但增加至十幾隊而有部份股份和資源重疊，有部分主權疑雲或人數不足，亦有違港足職業化精神。
港職聯是個市場包裝，其實只是個別班主對無法在足總掌權而宣示不滿所拋出的方案。足總大選在即，拋出這個議題是否為選舉做勢，明眼人自會分辦。不過就算真的搞得成，我覺得也只是換湯不換藥，不是提高香港足球水準的治標治本方法。但我當然也不希望見到當年精工及寶路華等，班主無法執掌足總而最後拿到冠軍也退出聯賽！
You are absolutely correct. By supporting a lot (as much as possible)
One can ascertain that one will achieve some kind of relative response depending on how co incidental the responsive data is to the attention. If the optimal supportive motivation is relative to the foundation (wether valid or not) a supportive return will follow.
Accuracy is the issue. This is an hypothetical deduction (not quite as comprehensive as educational requirements are about here in North America) but by any of the individuals motive intelligence. Linguistics and vocabulary play the most important part of communication. Gaps of data in verbal communication only provide confusion.
To express anything at all one must work untill one can say what one means in its entirety otherwise one will express a peer groups distrust and desire to avoid the issue. The bottom line is to study practical, basic, fundemental, primary, ground level technicalities of domestic level to know for sure one is known for sure and this aspect goes far and beyond the experience of the
marriage relationship which is considered by most the most complete education for the poor. From your good friend Bruce K. Paxton
