租一套燕尾禮服和高帽超過一百英鎊，女士的帽和衣飾更不只此數，值得嗎？七萬五千入皇家雅士谷的人都認為物有所值，因為這是傳統和氣氛。
七萬五千入場數字只是周六金禧賽日，周四非公眾假期的女士日也有六萬九千，而且女士們花枝招展，令人目不暇給，她們一心是為這個盛事而爭妍鬥麗。
我當然入鄉隨俗，高帽禮服入場之餘，也被邀往沙圈。「詩人作家」四奪雅士谷金盃的感人場面，簡直是震撼人心。
香港有人力、物力和硬件去做一個同樣的盛事，但軟件方面呢？如何令賓客投入，如何令參予者畢生難忘，如何真真正正可以搞好一個高級嘉年華會(未必一定是賽馬)，這就是個真正的學問。高格調而不俗套，又能令各界欣賞，我相信這正是目前香港公關界別的最大挑戰。不少大機構有錢亦很容易找到贊助，但要搵合適的人去搞，又放膽放心俾他們去搞，談何容易？
You are absolutely correct. By supporting a lot (as much as possible)
One can ascertain that one will achieve some kind of relative response depending on how co incidental the responsive data is to the attention. If the optimal supportive motivation is relative to the foundation (wether valid or not) a supportive return will follow.
Accuracy is the issue. This is an hypothetical deduction (not quite as comprehensive as educational requirements are about here in North America) but by any of the individuals motive intelligence. Linguistics and vocabulary play the most important part of communication. Gaps of data in verbal communication only provide confusion.
To express anything at all one must work untill one can say what one means in its entirety otherwise one will express a peer groups distrust and desire to avoid the issue. The bottom line is to study practical, basic, fundemental, primary, ground level technicalities of domestic level to know for sure one is known for sure and this aspect goes far and beyond the experience of the
marriage relationship which is considered by most the most complete education for the poor. From your good friend Bruce K. Paxton
