皇家雅士谷電視直播由BBC主打，而他們的陣容和編排認真值得香港學習。
主角是前女皇御用騎師嘉遜(「那時還」的主轡)夥拍包義鼎家族的Clare。嘉遜詼諧幽默但又莊重，年紀大卻有深厚賽馬和社交知識，Clare則餘賽馬與時裝專家於一身，二人的交波和穿針引線的作用，效果一流，尤其是報道女皇坐馬車進場，每一個細節嘉遜和Clare完全瞭如指掌，因為二人和家族都曾被「御用」，深懂禮節。
報道外圍賠率則起用桌球大師John Parrot，此君熟馬又熟外圍，套到許多堅料和賽馬以外的睇法。而沙圈睇馬重任，則放在前冠軍騎師戴禮身上，眼光和經驗不容置疑。
香港絕對有BBC般高水準製作人材，但電視台和有關機構是用專業眼光去用主持，抑或只是柴娃娃地想搞氣氛搏收視。有人說香港並無這樣全面的主持陣容；邊個話無？根本大有人在(但不多)，非「材之不眾」，而是上之人不懂或「不欲其眾」。
You are absolutely correct. By supporting a lot (as much as possible)
One can ascertain that one will achieve some kind of relative response depending on how co incidental the responsive data is to the attention. If the optimal supportive motivation is relative to the foundation (wether valid or not) a supportive return will follow.
Accuracy is the issue. This is an hypothetical deduction (not quite as comprehensive as educational requirements are about here in North America) but by any of the individuals motive intelligence. Linguistics and vocabulary play the most important part of communication. Gaps of data in verbal communication only provide confusion.
To express anything at all one must work untill one can say what one means in its entirety otherwise one will express a peer groups distrust and desire to avoid the issue. The bottom line is to study practical, basic, fundemental, primary, ground level technicalities of domestic level to know for sure one is known for sure and this aspect goes far and beyond the experience of the
marriage relationship which is considered by most the most complete education for the poor. From your good friend Bruce K. Paxton
雖然1+1未必等於2,但有冇聽過某位資深評馬人的金句? 就是「人算不如天算」！
黄嘉豪只是牆頭草,同吳生就吳生好同方生就方生啱同張生就張生叻,唉不提也吧！冇主見為何吳生當年這麼看得起他?
廖浩賢更不知所謂,嘩眾取寵,冇料扮有料,加上個樣不討好?
馬會近十年重用黃嘉豪是大錯,此人無把刀利,只懂吹
廖浩賢CALL馬水平被人抬高,連"準確"報導水平都做唔倒
搵果個梁浩賢充血統專家及外國馬高手,對吳生其實好大侮辱