華叔點錯將?(一)

2009/08/12 16:29:53 網誌分類: 賽馬
12 Aug

泛民妙想天開,想搞形式上公投,丐幫去盡獻「五區請辭」之策,想不到民主黨前黨鞭華叔立即點將「迎戰」,五區分別揀「阿人」「癲狗」「袋巾」「卿姐」同「阿蘭」。被選中者,未知感受如何。

如果真的搞成,泛民又一如德高望重的華叔般布陣出征,有些人話有信心結果可保持六四比,又或五區全勝,甚至有泛民中人說四勝一負也夠向中央示威。

筆者非政壇中人,但容許我的職業病發作去預測賽果:「人哥」在新界西聲勢夠浩大,亦有職工盟支持,鄉事及建制派無得打;「癲狗」在立法會夠勇,又有擁躉,建制派從來在西九都非強項,W硬。「卿姐」在新東累積廿幾年票源,單打獨鬥建制派無人夠撼;但我不看好「袋巾」,一來九東是勞工區,上次選「袋巾」已敬陪末席,而大家應記得九東是建制票倉之一,倘若我是建制派,必定重推「嫻姐」出山硬撼,而單打獨鬥,嫻姐在九龍東應贏「袋巾」。而泛民倘若港島派「蘭姐」再戰,對不起,建制出福建「玉姐」就已夠贏。大家不能以陳太贏葉太的比數作往績依據,因為許多港人至今仍不原諒葉太。〈明天續〉

回應 (0)
我要發表
user

最新回應

Bruce K. Paxton
Bruce K. Paxton 2017/07/16

You are absolutely correct. By supporting a lot (as much as possible)

One can ascertain that one will achieve some kind of relative response depending on how co incidental the responsive data is to the attention. If the optimal supportive motivation is relative to the foundation (wether valid or not) a supportive return will follow.

Accuracy is the issue. This is an hypothetical deduction (not quite as comprehensive as educational requirements are about here in North America) but by any of the individuals motive intelligence. Linguistics and vocabulary play the most important part of communication. Gaps of data in verbal communication only provide confusion.

To express anything at all one must work untill one can say what one means in its entirety otherwise       one   will express a peer groups distrust and desire to avoid the issue. The bottom line is to study practical, basic, fundemental, primary, ground level technicalities of domestic level to know for sure   one    is known for sure   and this aspect goes far and beyond the experience of the

 marriage relationship  which is considered by most the most complete education for the poor.    From your good friend Bruce K. Paxton