巫斯義周三將回港再上陣，記憶好的讀者都應對去季他提早離港時所提出的理由歷歷在目，結果他繼續在法國上陣，又在皇家雅士谷拼搏連場，如今歐洲平地賽差不多歇冬，他又回港出戰，似乎他仍眷戀這個令他名成利就的城市。學練馬？問問他自己吧！他去年為何離開，有待識做Investigative Reporting的記者去搜尋。
我是十分欣賞此君的騎功，他從無贏過香港冠軍，也未替我贏過任何頭馬，但巫斯義騎後勁馬的技巧和狠勁，欣賞指數值九十分以上，與冼毅力分庭抗禮。
我在電視說過，近十年不少公司管理層每每喜歡用數字去引證論點，這種量化的方式往往令未必深懂行業的業餘董事較易明白及容易被說服。但有高入座率未必是場好波，有高票房也不一定是好戲，同樣贏馬多的騎師是否騎功一流，相信識貨的馬迷自然心中有數。巫斯義可能是目前香港僅存能騎中駟贏上駟的騎師，大家不要小覷他的二綫座騎！
You are absolutely correct. By supporting a lot (as much as possible)
One can ascertain that one will achieve some kind of relative response depending on how co incidental the responsive data is to the attention. If the optimal supportive motivation is relative to the foundation (wether valid or not) a supportive return will follow.
Accuracy is the issue. This is an hypothetical deduction (not quite as comprehensive as educational requirements are about here in North America) but by any of the individuals motive intelligence. Linguistics and vocabulary play the most important part of communication. Gaps of data in verbal communication only provide confusion.
To express anything at all one must work untill one can say what one means in its entirety otherwise one will express a peer groups distrust and desire to avoid the issue. The bottom line is to study practical, basic, fundemental, primary, ground level technicalities of domestic level to know for sure one is known for sure and this aspect goes far and beyond the experience of the
marriage relationship which is considered by most the most complete education for the poor. From your good friend Bruce K. Paxton
香港冠軍