亞洲賽馬會議其中一個議題是「關注動物權益」，而主講嘉賓是遠自美國而來的前艷星寶黛麗。
憑一套《十》而大紅大紫，寶黛麗不但是憑演技，還有憑她十全十美（宣傳用語句）的身裁。
近年寶黛麗是美國馬匹權益協會的發言人，而其中一個主打的項目是反對屠殺退役馬匹，也倡議禁運馬肉往其他國家，由她振臂一呼，當然全國響應。
也許已故狄娜小姐不必再介懷當年做過光脫脫的艷星。因沒有當年的一脫成名，她日後改向政界和商界發展，也必無如此震撼，也不這麼備受注目。
寶黛麗其實與狄娜十分相似，也是藉著電影界的名氣，伸張自己的政見和抱負。她現在除關注馬匹權益外，還是退伍軍人協會的活躍分子，更被美國前總統喬治布殊委任為甘迺迪中心信託人之一。
如何爭取別人注意是自己的選擇，方法各有不同，若狄娜被稱為奇女子，寶黛麗又何嘗不是呢？
You are absolutely correct. By supporting a lot (as much as possible)
One can ascertain that one will achieve some kind of relative response depending on how co incidental the responsive data is to the attention. If the optimal supportive motivation is relative to the foundation (wether valid or not) a supportive return will follow.
Accuracy is the issue. This is an hypothetical deduction (not quite as comprehensive as educational requirements are about here in North America) but by any of the individuals motive intelligence. Linguistics and vocabulary play the most important part of communication. Gaps of data in verbal communication only provide confusion.
To express anything at all one must work untill one can say what one means in its entirety otherwise one will express a peer groups distrust and desire to avoid the issue. The bottom line is to study practical, basic, fundemental, primary, ground level technicalities of domestic level to know for sure one is known for sure and this aspect goes far and beyond the experience of the
marriage relationship which is considered by most the most complete education for the poor. From your good friend Bruce K. Paxton
