看到一篇文章有關部分八十後白領，在周末喜切斷一切外間聯絡，齊齊玩失蹤。活在自我空間，這當然是十分寫意，但文章中提及倘若工作上有急事，這群八十後「話知你」的態度，也的確衍生出不少要負責任的問題。
這個情形我們阻擋不了，但姑且分享一個個案給大家，公司曾聘用過一位從某超級大機構離職，更獲其前上司大力推薦給我的員工。這位年青員工因工作崗位關係，是彈性上班時間，但他充分利用這個先天條件，有時人影不見，有時客戶要找他完全聯絡不到，他出現時不是說見客，就是說過大海尋商機，不錯也交到一絲成績，但得失的客戶卻如天上繁星，因為在重要關頭永遠找不到他。
他已在去年離職，但有部分手尾他未交代好，公司同事要找他，完全找不到，好像人間蒸發似的。電話、電郵、FB及過往他的蒲點，完全不見蹤影。我以為出自超級大機構，管治和員工訓練會十分嚴格，但後生仔始終係後生仔，性格和自我主宰了一切，難搞！
You are absolutely correct. By supporting a lot (as much as possible)
One can ascertain that one will achieve some kind of relative response depending on how co incidental the responsive data is to the attention. If the optimal supportive motivation is relative to the foundation (wether valid or not) a supportive return will follow.
Accuracy is the issue. This is an hypothetical deduction (not quite as comprehensive as educational requirements are about here in North America) but by any of the individuals motive intelligence. Linguistics and vocabulary play the most important part of communication. Gaps of data in verbal communication only provide confusion.
To express anything at all one must work untill one can say what one means in its entirety otherwise one will express a peer groups distrust and desire to avoid the issue. The bottom line is to study practical, basic, fundemental, primary, ground level technicalities of domestic level to know for sure one is known for sure and this aspect goes far and beyond the experience of the
marriage relationship which is considered by most the most complete education for the poor. From your good friend Bruce K. Paxton
