向公司弟兄們形容「確有心得」是英超的韋根，應該貼切。
季初誰也不看好二者留級的機會，韋根曾跌到包尾，「確有心得」也在錯誤部署下，評分一減再減到八分，幾乎萬劫不復。
但大家也估不到，韋根在最後兩輪英超賽事破釜沉舟，先挫宿敵韋斯咸取三分，將韋斯咸踢到榜末，再在生死戰作客打贏史篤城，再取三分，壓過狼隊及伯明翰而逃出生天。
「確有心得」護級之路也十分凶險：廄主力薦跑千八，大敗後只得八分，錯過了全季最後一仗五班泥地千二(四十至十分)。儘管在我極力遊說下縮程，但全個五月分可供牠上陣的短途賽，只得五月十五日的千四米(四十至零分)。分了兩組後牠被偏較強的一組，跑快另外一組六綫而僅負一馬位跑第四。幸而獲加五分，再攻谷草千二，起步略慢，被逼走二疊，直路受內外夾擊，只跑第三，幸好蝕分跑再加五分。
七一的一役雖然不敵恭候多時的大超班馬「好玩神駒」，但再與上仗亞軍「駿盈」影相分勝負。蝕兩分兼騎師過一磅，就救回這匹低班短途馬。
You are absolutely correct. By supporting a lot (as much as possible)
One can ascertain that one will achieve some kind of relative response depending on how co incidental the responsive data is to the attention. If the optimal supportive motivation is relative to the foundation (wether valid or not) a supportive return will follow.
Accuracy is the issue. This is an hypothetical deduction (not quite as comprehensive as educational requirements are about here in North America) but by any of the individuals motive intelligence. Linguistics and vocabulary play the most important part of communication. Gaps of data in verbal communication only provide confusion.
To express anything at all one must work untill one can say what one means in its entirety otherwise one will express a peer groups distrust and desire to avoid the issue. The bottom line is to study practical, basic, fundemental, primary, ground level technicalities of domestic level to know for sure one is known for sure and this aspect goes far and beyond the experience of the
marriage relationship which is considered by most the most complete education for the poor. From your good friend Bruce K. Paxton
