Coleman 皈依源頭
Coleman 皈依源頭
Coleman 皈依源頭

【美財長蓋特納已被拘捕】銀河聯邦訊息

2012/07/17 05:41:47 網誌分類: 政治
17 Jul

July 16, 2012

你們正聽到這個;美國財政部部長蒂莫西·蓋特納(Timothy Geithner)已被拘捕,一直在試圖通過我們的高級法院,現因反對他本宣誓就職服務但卻選擇了加害,竊取和操縱並被逼到金融貧困邊緣的美國人民而被定罪。

這個個體,經過對他對你們,人民的罪行仔細沉思,已被判處最高63年的生命(maximum life of 63 years),這段時間他將在凡人的物理容器中(監獄)被再教育,在他恢復之前將不被允許行走在一個自由社會的人民中間。

這是他應得的懲罰;這是他罪行的報應。沒有任何的處罰強加在這個個體上,也將不會有任何進一步的懲罰強加在這個靈魂上,因為他將接受的正是作為一個在物質世界旅行,並很快的在多維宇宙精神領域的存有需要的進一步發展,成長和成熟。

你們明白了嗎,親愛的,當我們說將會有陰謀集團被捕或將會有因針對你們的陰謀集團被審判時所說的意思了嗎?沒有一個陰謀集團的成員在沒有接受來自我們更高維度以某種形式所提供給他們的康復服務項目之前將不會被允許自由地行走。

不是所有,也會有很多被捕的陰謀集團和他們的爪牙將會爭取,如果罪名成立,審判在你們世界不同司法管轄區的法院內。

那 些大量被拘捕的存有將會站在由那些被分派回顧被告生活檔案並決定一個適當的為他們成功康復的方法的已經揚升的存有們所建立的高級法院面前。懲罰不是這個時 代最重要的事,儘管這個單詞能被寬鬆地使用,它可以有詩意地,隱喻地使用,而它也可以被你們中的那些感覺那些因針對你們的人因他們的罪行被懲罰所感覺良好 的人所使用。

我們對你們說,根本沒有人會被『懲罰』,這個字感覺上是因為他們針對你們的罪行或他們的其他罪行。而相反,我們希望只關注有 效的康復措施,作為一個靈魂的康復將會為他們帶來另一個機會和機遇在一個社會結構,要不就在地球上或者在這個太陽系,要不就是銀河系或宇宙的另一個星球中 去發展成為有價值的成員。

有很多世界將會從因反人類罪而從存在於公民中的黑暗陰謀集團成員被捕或將會被捕中獲得收益。這些靈魂不是迷失的靈魂因為沒人會真正迷失,因為我們都會在某種方式,某種方法,某一天中找到自己的道路。

在 這種情況下,如果一個靈魂總是會找到他們回家的路那他還會迷失嗎?一個靈魂不會真正迷失。一個靈魂,無論迂迴於黑暗還是負面,他們可能需要一些時間去體驗 自己的某些方面,通過把自己降低到深處去徘徊和探索,依舊回來走向光和他們的造物主,即使當他們走下坡路或者相反的方向,對於這個多維宇宙來說只是一條單 行道。這是我們今天與你們分享的最大秘密。只有一種方法,那就是回歸光,返回到你虔誠,神聖,偉大的永恆的生命之光中。

這個男人是你們所知的美國財政部部長,一直朝著同一個趨勢。以至你們中的有些人把他當作敵人,敵對勢力,一個黑暗的罪犯。

他並沒有與你們不同,你們都是一樣的; 你們都是光,你們都是你們和我們造物主的一部分,他也一樣,他將繼續他的旅程,不過他會得到進一步的幫助來幫他發展得比他最近化身所經歷的快一點。這就是 我們,你們光之銀河聯邦已經揚升的家庭,介入並使用我們水平的專業知識,我們的智慧和我們的系統和結構來幫助一個在他們旅途上的靈魂。

我 們的工作不是也從未有過來到一個世界並把人民拘留,把他們扔到地牢或是監獄。這是對另一個靈魂荒唐的,不適宜的治療,我們不參與這種對待他人的殘酷行為, 並且我們永遠不會。蒂莫西·蓋特納將被對待以愛、仁慈、關懷與耐心。他與他所是的靈魂,會享有愛,智慧地培育和來自更高維度因通過他或她很多的體驗積累了 優秀的智慧和技能的存有的指導,也會帶他們穿過黑暗的走廊就像他們的學生可能迷路,就像蓋特納先生。

你們現在明白我們都走曲折的愛之路,穿過黑暗,通過測試和考驗我們的精神,我們的靈魂,如果我們沒這麼做,如果我們不保護自己被淹沒在黑暗中?

我們如何知道我們是光。黑暗是一個任務,一個挑戰,一個我們必須學會用光造的船隻穿越的海洋。

黑暗是一把鋒利的刀,我們必須鍛造一個光之護盾來保衛自己,黑暗是一個當你需要敵人時候的敵人,黑暗是一個當你需要朋友時候的朋友,但是黑暗並不是你真正的敵人。

他是你的朋友因為他的確幫助你找到了回歸光的道路,回到你本來所是的地方,回到你本來所屬的光中,回到你出生的地方,你表面上看起來凋零(死亡)的地方,在那你將會再度出現,在那你會永恆地存在於你永不休止的回歸源頭的旅程。

我們希望今天的信息能夠到達你們中那些從黑暗角度看事情的人,從黑暗中看到一點亮光的人,今天分享了一個更明亮的意義。我們是你們的光之家族,存在與這個宇宙與光對比的黑暗中讓我們看見它是如此得閃耀。


我們是光之銀河聯邦。
回應 (2)
我要發表
Coleman 皈依源頭
Coleman 皈依源頭 2012/07/17 11:41:04 回覆

雖然還未找到蓋特納已被拘捕的新聞,但已找到蓋特納包庇操控利率的新聞

Coleman 皈依源頭
Coleman 皈依源頭 2012/07/17 05:46:04 回覆
Geithner yawned at epic fraud

Posted: 10:36 PM, July 15, 2012

New York Post

Tim Geithner had evidence of a financial crime of epic proportion — so he wrote a memo.

That’s about the only way you can sum up the then-New York Fed boss’ actions several years ago, when he was confronted with fairly compelling evidence that banks under his direct supervision were manipulating Libor — a key benchmark of global finance.

The Libor scandal has become pretty big news, with Barclays ousting its CEO and agreeing to pay a large fine even as it cooperates with civil and criminal law-enforcement authorities now investigating other big banks.



But it doesn’t end there: There’s also evidence that top regulators, including Geithner, now Treasury secretary, knew about and largely ignored the mess.

On Friday, the New York Fed released documents that supposedly exonerate Geithner. s elective leaks to friendly news outlets ensured kind first-day coverage, with one headline reading “Geithner tried to curb bank’s rate rigging in 2008.”

But that’s a bizarrely generous read of Geithner’s action (or inaction) on learning that Barclays actually admitted to one of his investigators that it had submitted false data for the computation of Libor, and that other banks were doing the same.

As I wrote last week, the New York Fed has long enjoyed a cozy relationship with the banks under its regulatory umbrella — ignoring even the stuff that brought down the financial system in 2008.

A close associate of former Clinton Treasury Secretary and top Citigroup exec Robert Rubin, Geithner has spent most of his professional life as a federal financial bureaucrat — a member of a community that keeps close ties with the heads of the major banks. Yet even by that standard, his behavior in the Libor scandal is incredible.

Libor, the London Interbank Offered Rate, is set by a UK banking trade group, which uses the big banks’ borrowing costs to compute a single benchmark rate that’s widely used on complex financial products as well as consumer loans.

In other words, rigging Libor is a pretty big deal. Yet Geithner treated it like a parking violation.

In 2007 and 2008, as the banking crisis began to heat up and big investors started demanding higher interest rates when lending to the banks, evidence began to build that banks were submitting falsely low borrowing costs to mask their financial distress.

Barclays was one such bank. Indeed, the New York Fed learned as early as December 2007 that Barclays may have been manipulating Libor — but Geithner’s crew waited until April 2008 to make its initial inquiry, documents show.

That’s when a New York Fed official contacted a trading executive at Barclays — who admitted the dirty deed with very little pressure: “We know that we’re not posting, um, an honest Libor.”

The trader’s rationale: If the bank posted its real borrowing costs, then spiking in the runup to the banking crisis, “It draws, um, unwanted attention on ourselves.”

The trader indicated that other banks were submitting fake info, too. The New York Fed regulator conducting the interview didn’t seem particularly outraged, answering with a simple “OK.”

Maybe the Fed official didn’t want to show her cards, but you’d think that a competent regulator hearing a concession like would get the wheels of justice moving pretty quickly. But not at Tim Geithner’s New York Fed.

Geithner was brought in right after the call — and his response was more of the same. He sent a single e-mail to his counterpart at the Bank of England recommending a handful of ways to address Libor rigging, including how UK regulators “should eliminate incentive to misreport.”

So here you have it: In Geithner’s world, rate-rigging fraud is “misreporting.”

His UK counterpart, Bank of England Governor Mervyn King, didn’t do much better. He e-mailed Geithner that he’d ask the trade group “to include in their consultation document the ideas contained in your note.”

Other than a few followup calls from his staff to traders, that’s about the end of Geithner’s real interest in the matter — until it came to light that the practices were much worse and more pervasive than even the Barclays trader had suggested, and that other big banks directly under the New York Fed’s jurisdiction were manipulating one of the world’s most important financial barometers.

Or, as Geithner put it, “misreporting.”

Charles Gasparino is a Fox Business Network senior correspondent.





user

最新回應

Cigam
Cigam 2019/10/27

盈虛仍有數........往天台

指的該是三峽工程及其水掩大地的影響

Cigam
Cigam 2019/10/27

二四八,三七九

指的是八九年的六四運動

二四八,前缺一

三七九,中缺五

89年6月4日,正是農曆五月初一

十八十八
十八十八 2019/10/22

二四八那段開始

小弟覺得

777說的是香港特首林鄭

Coleman 皈依源頭
@我才是義士...

我只看見中國的人民被中共政府欺負和剝削。我只知連馬雲的全副身家都被中共政府吃掉。

新疆原本是自治區,因為有石油,所以全面被中共政府控制和剝削。香港原本是繁華的商業和金融的自治城市,因為繁華富裕,所以中共政府又想全面控制和剝削。

君子無罪,懷壁其罪。

支持盗賊的就是盗賊。

我只知有很多無耻之徒想擠身中共政府,想從被剝削者成為剝削者。