三天的亞洲賽馬會議，對我輩馬痴來說，會期實在太短，事實上不少專業知識以及真知妁見，都令人增廣見聞。七百多八百海外參加者之中，大部分都是業界精英，發言者有分量，發問者同樣專業。
與幾年前我在澳洲悉尼出席時比較，今次的陣容更龐大，也顯示出香港組織力的確不凡。對於大會在舟車、賽事、膳食、節目，以及研討會的安排，前來參與的來賓，上至外國馬會主席總裁下至業界初哥，都讚不絕口。無論下次由哪個地區主辦，都會有點壓力。
今天壓軸的主題是中國賽馬發展，究竟與會各國如何透視中國未來對賽馬的參與？而如果未來是積極參與的話，配套又如何？而他們對賽馬業的貢獻或震撼，又會帶來甚麼影響呢？估計會展的座位，將會高朋滿座。
在這三天之中，並無仔細數過有多少黃皮膚黑眼晴的香港馬主或馬會會員參與其中，但肯定的是參與者都獲益良多。
You are absolutely correct. By supporting a lot (as much as possible)
One can ascertain that one will achieve some kind of relative response depending on how co incidental the responsive data is to the attention. If the optimal supportive motivation is relative to the foundation (wether valid or not) a supportive return will follow.
Accuracy is the issue. This is an hypothetical deduction (not quite as comprehensive as educational requirements are about here in North America) but by any of the individuals motive intelligence. Linguistics and vocabulary play the most important part of communication. Gaps of data in verbal communication only provide confusion.
To express anything at all one must work untill one can say what one means in its entirety otherwise one will express a peer groups distrust and desire to avoid the issue. The bottom line is to study practical, basic, fundemental, primary, ground level technicalities of domestic level to know for sure one is known for sure and this aspect goes far and beyond the experience of the
marriage relationship which is considered by most the most complete education for the poor. From your good friend Bruce K. Paxton
