下周又出發了，不過今次不是去新加坡，而是去澳洲參加雌馬及幼馬拍賣會。
我已全情投入賽馬及育馬事業，代理事宜在好幾年前已拋諸腦後。自己、家人及合作夥伴大把資源，老友有馬要幫眼睇睇當然無所謂，但專業代理？留番要上位搵老細的後生仔去做吧！
細心的朋友早已知道我買馬是用自己名的，並非用代理或公司名義，這個紀錄大家可從各拍賣行網上資料取得。但拍賣我也從不假代理之手，自己不在場，一定不參與，因為每個拍賣會一定要過自己對眼。
還有倘有雌馬或周歲馬出售，對不起，我不像某些香港朋友般想創立自家牧場品牌。我只會將適當雌馬放在適當牧場，幼馬或周歲馬則由牧場代為在拍賣行出售。
還有這些活動完全是興趣和玩意式活動，不含商業元素，與名育馬者蔡醫生相若。蔡醫生與我有一個共同看法，就是自己有專業，育馬只是個發燒大玩意。
You are absolutely correct. By supporting a lot (as much as possible)
One can ascertain that one will achieve some kind of relative response depending on how co incidental the responsive data is to the attention. If the optimal supportive motivation is relative to the foundation (wether valid or not) a supportive return will follow.
Accuracy is the issue. This is an hypothetical deduction (not quite as comprehensive as educational requirements are about here in North America) but by any of the individuals motive intelligence. Linguistics and vocabulary play the most important part of communication. Gaps of data in verbal communication only provide confusion.
To express anything at all one must work untill one can say what one means in its entirety otherwise one will express a peer groups distrust and desire to avoid the issue. The bottom line is to study practical, basic, fundemental, primary, ground level technicalities of domestic level to know for sure one is known for sure and this aspect goes far and beyond the experience of the
marriage relationship which is considered by most the most complete education for the poor. From your good friend Bruce K. Paxton
