中了PP簽但心情並無異樣，因為今次已不是第一次中，也估計以後會繼續中，但要揀一匹夠資格而又健康正常兼且有進步可扶搖直上的，絕不容易。
但是否一定要一千幾百萬才可覓到佳駟？咁又未必。一千幾百萬跑來三甲不入者，大不乏人，有時一百幾十萬的馬反而在頂班一樣可交出頭馬。買PP時是兩歲或三歲，來港後要進步才可與年長馬較高下。兩歲贏表列賽，水準只是四班左右，不進步，就只能在三四班棲遲。
自己已有不少馬養在澳紐而且已贏夠運港資格，但若是在彼邦跑二千米或以上表現出色的，運來港意義不大。當然我也想帶一匹自己培育的運港，但未經高級賽事評估，我也不敢輕易作出決定，始終香港養馬費是全球數一數二高昂的地方，三班贏一場，淨收益不夠一年養馬，過時過節雜項亦多。當年「富有心得」是個奇迹，寄望第二次發生，倒不如慎重選擇。
You are absolutely correct. By supporting a lot (as much as possible)
One can ascertain that one will achieve some kind of relative response depending on how co incidental the responsive data is to the attention. If the optimal supportive motivation is relative to the foundation (wether valid or not) a supportive return will follow.
Accuracy is the issue. This is an hypothetical deduction (not quite as comprehensive as educational requirements are about here in North America) but by any of the individuals motive intelligence. Linguistics and vocabulary play the most important part of communication. Gaps of data in verbal communication only provide confusion.
To express anything at all one must work untill one can say what one means in its entirety otherwise one will express a peer groups distrust and desire to avoid the issue. The bottom line is to study practical, basic, fundemental, primary, ground level technicalities of domestic level to know for sure one is known for sure and this aspect goes far and beyond the experience of the
marriage relationship which is considered by most the most complete education for the poor. From your good friend Bruce K. Paxton
