究竟陳貝兒苟芸慧等有所謂觀眾緣，抑或韓毓霞的專業？究竟觀眾真的喜歡聽阿叻及一班無線評述，抑或是蘇文普、何鑑江甚至已故林尚義式的球評？
對不起，決定權不在觀眾，而是在無線老闆及管理層。事實上任何傳媒決定，也在管理層或老細，老細喜歡專業，就用老細熟悉(O既)專業人仕；老細喜歡玩玩下，就用老細認為靚女的人主持。老細俾錢，由佢話事。
我習慣睇英文台，不因我在外國多年，而是英文台的評述方式是我的一杯茶。不徐不疾，不依嘩鬼叫，專業、冷靜，完全容許你自己投入球賽。
看球賽是享受，要睇是睇球員表演，而並非聽你們搞笑或不專業。
恕我有點不合群︰不少國際級大賽，我都寧願到外國看，一來時差較佳，二來也是自己喜歡的氣氛。不過今年因要等書展，無法，侷住留港。好彩仲有明珠台！
You are absolutely correct. By supporting a lot (as much as possible)
One can ascertain that one will achieve some kind of relative response depending on how co incidental the responsive data is to the attention. If the optimal supportive motivation is relative to the foundation (wether valid or not) a supportive return will follow.
Accuracy is the issue. This is an hypothetical deduction (not quite as comprehensive as educational requirements are about here in North America) but by any of the individuals motive intelligence. Linguistics and vocabulary play the most important part of communication. Gaps of data in verbal communication only provide confusion.
To express anything at all one must work untill one can say what one means in its entirety otherwise one will express a peer groups distrust and desire to avoid the issue. The bottom line is to study practical, basic, fundemental, primary, ground level technicalities of domestic level to know for sure one is known for sure and this aspect goes far and beyond the experience of the
marriage relationship which is considered by most the most complete education for the poor. From your good friend Bruce K. Paxton
