今次澳洲之旅收穫最多的自然不是我︰與我同行的同事及評馬同業無不讚嘆外國的育馬和賽馬事業，而我告訴他們，今次九天旅程只是蜻蜓點水，冰山一角而已，未來要學懂的東西，起碼十倍百倍以上。
每個專業都有ＣＰＤ，以提升專業水平以及對行業的了解和學習新知。評馬行業有無這個安排，大家有目共睹。也評現今的馬迷對評馬人的需求比不上以前高，也評要求可能比以前高很多，但從廿一世紀目前的專業賽馬(注意︰不是賭馬和貼馬)知識水平與上世紀九十年代那種百花齊放，瓣瓣有高人，頂級馬評家的收入比不少專業人士還多，也有其市場(如資訊聆、寫稿、收費網站等)。有一位已退休的記者因為線路縱橫，廣為報界採用，月薪動輒幾十萬。
現在免費資訊泛濫，馬迷也未必懂得分辨哪些是專業，哪些是垃圾，所以專業賽馬資訊(不是賭馬資訊)在香港的地位大不如前。以前馬迷會聽你詳細分析，因為你有邏輯又掌握真知識，現在馬迷可能只需要二拖三四五，求其貼中便算。時移世易，需求不同也！
You are absolutely correct. By supporting a lot (as much as possible)
One can ascertain that one will achieve some kind of relative response depending on how co incidental the responsive data is to the attention. If the optimal supportive motivation is relative to the foundation (wether valid or not) a supportive return will follow.
Accuracy is the issue. This is an hypothetical deduction (not quite as comprehensive as educational requirements are about here in North America) but by any of the individuals motive intelligence. Linguistics and vocabulary play the most important part of communication. Gaps of data in verbal communication only provide confusion.
To express anything at all one must work untill one can say what one means in its entirety otherwise one will express a peer groups distrust and desire to avoid the issue. The bottom line is to study practical, basic, fundemental, primary, ground level technicalities of domestic level to know for sure one is known for sure and this aspect goes far and beyond the experience of the
marriage relationship which is considered by most the most complete education for the poor. From your good friend Bruce K. Paxton
