早前搬寫字樓，清理書櫃藏書，見到羅拔桑士達親筆簽名版本的自傳Horsetrader，這自傳是阿當桑士達之子在九四年送給我，轉瞬已二十年了。而放在旁的是一代練馬宗師歐伯恩Vincent O'Brien的同名自傳，也是由歐伯恩親筆簽名，由其媳婦譚美送贈。
有關此類親筆簽名賽馬典籍，我還有不少，也是由當事人或其親人餽贈，這主要是多年來周遊列國，與真正馬圈中人建立多年關係和友誼之緣故。我曾與歐伯恩同車前往看葉森打?，與老哥連希斯在南澳靈犀牧場大宅飲紅酒及在牧場附近行山。以上全屬真人真事，不容「挑機」分子不信。
所以上兩周帶同事及傳媒朋友訪問澳洲昆士蘭和新南威爾斯，先不談食宿安排，在布里斯本東奔我們是坐委員廂房，亦由馬會主席及總裁招呼，去古摩亞是坐私人飛機，去名勝觀光有旅遊部專人接待。我要多謝這些好友的熱情款待之餘，也感受到自己多年來在世界馬圈奔波，總算沒有白費。
You are absolutely correct. By supporting a lot (as much as possible)
One can ascertain that one will achieve some kind of relative response depending on how co incidental the responsive data is to the attention. If the optimal supportive motivation is relative to the foundation (wether valid or not) a supportive return will follow.
Accuracy is the issue. This is an hypothetical deduction (not quite as comprehensive as educational requirements are about here in North America) but by any of the individuals motive intelligence. Linguistics and vocabulary play the most important part of communication. Gaps of data in verbal communication only provide confusion.
To express anything at all one must work untill one can say what one means in its entirety otherwise one will express a peer groups distrust and desire to avoid the issue. The bottom line is to study practical, basic, fundemental, primary, ground level technicalities of domestic level to know for sure one is known for sure and this aspect goes far and beyond the experience of the
marriage relationship which is considered by most the most complete education for the poor. From your good friend Bruce K. Paxton
