香港人近年人云亦云的趨勢愈來愈嚴重，訊息不經大腦過濾就在討論區和社交網站轉發的情形日益增多。不論你是甚麼背景和政治立場，總之一有自己表面上啱聽，而咁啱有人不認同的話，就來個玉石俱焚，謾罵有之，網上開戰有之。
而政治兩極化的階段，連遊行示威都好像黑社會晒馬，大家鬥人多。老實說，這些充滿水份的騷，正是兩方主辦者為求目的的籌碼，冷靜想想，你有無變成其他人擺布的棋子呢！
無論在甚麼圈子，都一樣是錢大晒，你可以說別人派錢Call人遊行，他可以說傳媒阿頭獻金叫議員搞局，機構也可大到用金錢和廣告影響傳媒報道。我不敢說外國是否有同樣現象，但以上現象，是不應在文明的香港發生。
有不少朋友說近十年的香港我們已愈來愈不熟悉了，你們同意嗎？
You are absolutely correct. By supporting a lot (as much as possible)
One can ascertain that one will achieve some kind of relative response depending on how co incidental the responsive data is to the attention. If the optimal supportive motivation is relative to the foundation (wether valid or not) a supportive return will follow.
Accuracy is the issue. This is an hypothetical deduction (not quite as comprehensive as educational requirements are about here in North America) but by any of the individuals motive intelligence. Linguistics and vocabulary play the most important part of communication. Gaps of data in verbal communication only provide confusion.
To express anything at all one must work untill one can say what one means in its entirety otherwise one will express a peer groups distrust and desire to avoid the issue. The bottom line is to study practical, basic, fundemental, primary, ground level technicalities of domestic level to know for sure one is known for sure and this aspect goes far and beyond the experience of the
marriage relationship which is considered by most the most complete education for the poor. From your good friend Bruce K. Paxton
拜讀全文,幾乎都同意,只"文明的香港"四字不大同意!