一個卡梅倫托大的決定，幾乎令英國斷送了三百多年經營蘇格蘭的基業。幸虧蘇格蘭陣營大將凋零，來來去去也只得一個薩蒙德，一去到重要經濟或民生議題就左閃右避，就算蘇格蘭人如何愛國，一旦獨立後的生活又有何保障？更何況英國不是暴政，國泰民安之下又豈有獨立逼切性呢？
自己是半個學者，也一向尊重不同機構的民意調查，但大家在看傳媒公布的數字同時，也要認清楚甚麼調查是別有用心又或結果一定偏頗的；而所謂網絡調查或留言，肯定不止一人一票，這個世界不是聲大或長期佔住電腦平台就能改變的。
請記住世界上仍有大多數人不碰或無時間碰電腦，而一樣有Say有投票權的。 如今一如九五年魁北克一樣，蘇格蘭錯過和平獨立的最佳時機，相信以後再難有此機會。艾亞、伯斯等馬場，也繼續以英國賽例舉行賽事了！
You are absolutely correct. By supporting a lot (as much as possible)
One can ascertain that one will achieve some kind of relative response depending on how co incidental the responsive data is to the attention. If the optimal supportive motivation is relative to the foundation (wether valid or not) a supportive return will follow.
Accuracy is the issue. This is an hypothetical deduction (not quite as comprehensive as educational requirements are about here in North America) but by any of the individuals motive intelligence. Linguistics and vocabulary play the most important part of communication. Gaps of data in verbal communication only provide confusion.
To express anything at all one must work untill one can say what one means in its entirety otherwise one will express a peer groups distrust and desire to avoid the issue. The bottom line is to study practical, basic, fundemental, primary, ground level technicalities of domestic level to know for sure one is known for sure and this aspect goes far and beyond the experience of the
marriage relationship which is considered by most the most complete education for the poor. From your good friend Bruce K. Paxton
