匯豐前亞太區主席兼馬會前副主席艾爾敦周初在其網誌投下深水炸彈，道出香港中上流社會不少人放在心中而不敢說出來的話。他是英國人，也已不在匯豐及香港工作，在旁食花生發表言論，不用擔心自己前途。
但他一語道出不少不喜歡梁振英的建制派心聲，而老實說中央嚴打貪腐為這兩年的主題，說UGL事件對特首無影響是不可能的。當然中央已撐了他兩年多，除非證據確鑿，否則也會一直撐到他任滿為止。
還記得零三年中央撤換特首，主要是建制派田北俊及自由黨陣前倒戈令廿三條不能通過。我覺得特首的地位，中央未必會急急採取主動，以免國際間感覺他們直接干預香港事務。如果有事件令建制派也忍無可忍倒戈，才會發生艾爾敦所說的情況。
不過我很高興艾爾敦也正確地道出，連英國國會選舉候選人也有篩選，而佔領行動已去到過分而擾民的階段，不得民心的政治運動，從來都是慘淡收場。學生們不得不正視現實，不值得為一啖氣而拖下去。
You are absolutely correct. By supporting a lot (as much as possible)
One can ascertain that one will achieve some kind of relative response depending on how co incidental the responsive data is to the attention. If the optimal supportive motivation is relative to the foundation (wether valid or not) a supportive return will follow.
Accuracy is the issue. This is an hypothetical deduction (not quite as comprehensive as educational requirements are about here in North America) but by any of the individuals motive intelligence. Linguistics and vocabulary play the most important part of communication. Gaps of data in verbal communication only provide confusion.
To express anything at all one must work untill one can say what one means in its entirety otherwise one will express a peer groups distrust and desire to avoid the issue. The bottom line is to study practical, basic, fundemental, primary, ground level technicalities of domestic level to know for sure one is known for sure and this aspect goes far and beyond the experience of the
marriage relationship which is considered by most the most complete education for the poor. From your good friend Bruce K. Paxton
