香港目前的處境是進退失據，如果當時警方放催淚彈後並排推進驅趕示威者，可能被人大罵幾天，但市面相信已回復平靜，交通正常。(老實說我當然不贊成放催淚彈)但如今不戰不和不守，就一如當年清朝兩廣總督葉名琛般，注定香港社會被人拖住，有排受害了。
學聯並無利用談判後的下台階撤走，變成倘若出武力，學生也要陪同受害。須知若用武力鎮壓，暴徒、示威者及學生並無額頭貼著標記識別；反而若學聯呼籲學生撤離，剩下的一律被視為「學聯不代表他們」的年長示威者，警方就出師有名了。
爭取民主是個長時間的過程，無必要為意氣而爭朝夕，贏一場戰役而輸掉戰爭，就極可能是泛民、佔中三子以及學生所面對的，因為社會實際上已十分厭惡他們持斷日久的影響民生行為。
我亦深信警方的克制，是政府甚至中央的善意，但既然示威者得些好意也不回首，大家看見美國警察如何對付示威者或暴徒，就知道甚麼是國際標準了。
You are absolutely correct. By supporting a lot (as much as possible)
One can ascertain that one will achieve some kind of relative response depending on how co incidental the responsive data is to the attention. If the optimal supportive motivation is relative to the foundation (wether valid or not) a supportive return will follow.
Accuracy is the issue. This is an hypothetical deduction (not quite as comprehensive as educational requirements are about here in North America) but by any of the individuals motive intelligence. Linguistics and vocabulary play the most important part of communication. Gaps of data in verbal communication only provide confusion.
To express anything at all one must work untill one can say what one means in its entirety otherwise one will express a peer groups distrust and desire to avoid the issue. The bottom line is to study practical, basic, fundemental, primary, ground level technicalities of domestic level to know for sure one is known for sure and this aspect goes far and beyond the experience of the
marriage relationship which is considered by most the most complete education for the poor. From your good friend Bruce K. Paxton
