八九十後的心態，是不少六七十後完全不能明白的。
自我中心，個人價值無限放大，就是今次搞事的學聯成員的共通點。打沉香港隻船咪打沉，反正未來是我們的，齊齊衰有乜所謂？
他們能否代表學界的見解已經頗成疑問，但面對傳媒口口聲聲卻說代表港人，這是最不能接受的。
請問誰人授權你代表港人？請問誰人選你代表港人？你說代表學生我未必會與你辯駁，但代表港人？你們不配也無資格。要代表港人，請先參加選舉，當選後才按你的情況說代表誰(例如功能組別代表其業界，區議員代表其區)。
網上流傳TVB吳璟瓗KO周永康的畫面，以前我們自己未夠料，一定不會出聲，也尊重先輩意見。你們可以搜集周永康由佔中開始到今天的受訪言論，交給大學無政治背景的邏輯或社會學教授去評論，就知道這位口口聲聲說代表港人的後生仔，究竟有幾多料？
You are absolutely correct. By supporting a lot (as much as possible)
One can ascertain that one will achieve some kind of relative response depending on how co incidental the responsive data is to the attention. If the optimal supportive motivation is relative to the foundation (wether valid or not) a supportive return will follow.
Accuracy is the issue. This is an hypothetical deduction (not quite as comprehensive as educational requirements are about here in North America) but by any of the individuals motive intelligence. Linguistics and vocabulary play the most important part of communication. Gaps of data in verbal communication only provide confusion.
To express anything at all one must work untill one can say what one means in its entirety otherwise one will express a peer groups distrust and desire to avoid the issue. The bottom line is to study practical, basic, fundemental, primary, ground level technicalities of domestic level to know for sure one is known for sure and this aspect goes far and beyond the experience of the
marriage relationship which is considered by most the most complete education for the poor. From your good friend Bruce K. Paxton
