有點痛心是部分外國朋友單憑偏頗傳媒報道及單方面的畫面，就說香港陷入暴亂，警方濫用武力。
外國朋友不懂中文，外媒也在畫面上滅聲，他們完全聽不到及聽不明暴民的叫囂及挑釁說話。他們更看不到有線新聞台拍到警察被硬物(頭盔？小樽？)擲中倒地，又或警察被示威者襲擊流血的情況。而外媒更加不會拍攝暴民台下的磚頭及木塊。
暴民將學生擺上檯，學生不撤，暴民就在他們背後伺機搗亂搞局，而從鏡頭看到，衝擊的不少是激進泛民成員，學生就成了代罪羔羊。
而旺角那些不理性的執錢，叫嚷購物，是玩嘢的爛仔行為，不幸地不少年青人被羊群心態作蒙蔽。
昨日在沙田向一位政府高層進言，攻城為下，攻心為上。就算今年平亂，政府要日後好好想想，如何挽回年青一代的心，以及令他們重回正軌。他們的行為和禮貌，已偏離香港傳統思想和精神。台灣選舉國民黨大敗，正是前車可鑑︰後生仔不是人人諗住錢的。
You are absolutely correct. By supporting a lot (as much as possible)
One can ascertain that one will achieve some kind of relative response depending on how co incidental the responsive data is to the attention. If the optimal supportive motivation is relative to the foundation (wether valid or not) a supportive return will follow.
Accuracy is the issue. This is an hypothetical deduction (not quite as comprehensive as educational requirements are about here in North America) but by any of the individuals motive intelligence. Linguistics and vocabulary play the most important part of communication. Gaps of data in verbal communication only provide confusion.
To express anything at all one must work untill one can say what one means in its entirety otherwise one will express a peer groups distrust and desire to avoid the issue. The bottom line is to study practical, basic, fundemental, primary, ground level technicalities of domestic level to know for sure one is known for sure and this aspect goes far and beyond the experience of the
marriage relationship which is considered by most the most complete education for the poor. From your good friend Bruce K. Paxton
