過了一個很忙但很愉快的國際賽日。
開心的不單只是國際賽事四Ｗ全中兼中兩條直掘單式三重彩(一哩賽及盃賽)，而是與世界馬壇最頂尖國家的要員，一起分享了過往一年的發展形勢，也審視了未來的挑戰。
愛爾蘭賽馬局主席、澳洲賽馬局總裁、紐西蘭賽馬局總裁、澳洲投注局總裁、新加坡賽馬公會總裁、英國投注局總裁，位位都是業界精英中的精英，對賽馬認識無出其右之餘，也是行政高手。差點忘記了，其中不少也是與我一樣，是會計師出身。
當今賽馬機構的高級行政人員，不少都是會計師或工商管理畢業出身。世界瞬息萬變，每個決定櫂都可能對業界財政影響深遠，沒有財經知識是不可能主理五百人或以上的大機構，更遑論是業界。
過程有點像華山論劍，各門派頂尖兒高手互相就業界議題交流，而且是深層次的。不過內容卻不是評論馬匹實力，而是業界行政的議題。馬匹實力，不需多講了，全在心中，而且齊齊贏錢！
You are absolutely correct. By supporting a lot (as much as possible)
One can ascertain that one will achieve some kind of relative response depending on how co incidental the responsive data is to the attention. If the optimal supportive motivation is relative to the foundation (wether valid or not) a supportive return will follow.
Accuracy is the issue. This is an hypothetical deduction (not quite as comprehensive as educational requirements are about here in North America) but by any of the individuals motive intelligence. Linguistics and vocabulary play the most important part of communication. Gaps of data in verbal communication only provide confusion.
To express anything at all one must work untill one can say what one means in its entirety otherwise one will express a peer groups distrust and desire to avoid the issue. The bottom line is to study practical, basic, fundemental, primary, ground level technicalities of domestic level to know for sure one is known for sure and this aspect goes far and beyond the experience of the
marriage relationship which is considered by most the most complete education for the poor. From your good friend Bruce K. Paxton
好多年前，跟你某電訊商提供收費短信貼士，
輸到趴街！
唉……