當普羅馬迷在賽日賭個天昏地暗，週三我在谷中是心不在焉的，原因是一位在香港馬圈貢獻良多的好友猝然離世，而且是英年早逝。
龍達明兄並非馬會僱員，亦非博彩人士，而是賽馬保險業數一數二龍頭大公司ＭＩ的老闆。全港做本地馬匹保險的公司只得兩大間，ＭＩ是其中之一，亦是不少香港練馬師採用的一間，因為ＭＩ其中一位代理正是前冠軍練馬師陳毓麟之女陳麗君。不講大家可能不知，ＭＩ的前身，就是世界保險業行尊Moller，老摩拿贏過葉森打比，是超級賽馬發燒友，連大摩當年掛靴後而未做練馬師之時，也做過摩拿的保險工作。現在的ＭＩ已非摩拿家族擁有，反而是龍達明的生意，聖誕節前後，我亦與龍達明一起跑過馬，交換過不少業界心得。
其實龍兄去季才第一次養馬，替他以極平價錢揀來「當時得令」，出了幾仗便爆冷取勝，一起開心了好一陣子，怎料暑假這匹年稚馬突然絞腸痧暴斃，十分可惜，以為是替馬主擋了一劫。可惜天妒英才，龍兄踏入一五年在毫無癥兆下心臟病發猝逝，殊為可惜。
You are absolutely correct. By supporting a lot (as much as possible)
One can ascertain that one will achieve some kind of relative response depending on how co incidental the responsive data is to the attention. If the optimal supportive motivation is relative to the foundation (wether valid or not) a supportive return will follow.
Accuracy is the issue. This is an hypothetical deduction (not quite as comprehensive as educational requirements are about here in North America) but by any of the individuals motive intelligence. Linguistics and vocabulary play the most important part of communication. Gaps of data in verbal communication only provide confusion.
To express anything at all one must work untill one can say what one means in its entirety otherwise one will express a peer groups distrust and desire to avoid the issue. The bottom line is to study practical, basic, fundemental, primary, ground level technicalities of domestic level to know for sure one is known for sure and this aspect goes far and beyond the experience of the
marriage relationship which is considered by most the most complete education for the poor. From your good friend Bruce K. Paxton
