與大家分享一些會計及財務的基本知識。
一間有限公司，在法律上股東是付了錢認購了應得的股份，就算公司虧本，債主臨門，債是不上個人的身。
有限公司通常營運者是董事局，董事是董事局成員，替公司決策作集體決定，故有任何法律責任如欠薪等，董事要負上刑責，罰款有之，坐監也有可能。
很多小型公司董事也是股東，做生意就算是有限公司，也講個信字，故若資不抵債，這些中小企的董事兼股東就貸款給公司，讓公司渡過難關。
但較為大型的公司，不少股東因只視作為投資，並不參予營運，都不擔任董事。就算可以擔任，也只可能派代表，作為監察營運和行政，股東自己不會直接管理。
如果要怪，就要怪歐洲數百年的有限公司法律，令股東不用上身。原意是好的，實際上有部分人則走法律罅去逃避責任。
亞視今日欠薪風波，收勞工處傳票的，是亞視這間有限公司及董事葉家寶。股東如黃炳均、蔡衍明甚至查懋聲全部甩身，這就是法律保障了他們。公義與否，這條法律無法涵蓋！
You are absolutely correct. By supporting a lot (as much as possible)
One can ascertain that one will achieve some kind of relative response depending on how co incidental the responsive data is to the attention. If the optimal supportive motivation is relative to the foundation (wether valid or not) a supportive return will follow.
Accuracy is the issue. This is an hypothetical deduction (not quite as comprehensive as educational requirements are about here in North America) but by any of the individuals motive intelligence. Linguistics and vocabulary play the most important part of communication. Gaps of data in verbal communication only provide confusion.
To express anything at all one must work untill one can say what one means in its entirety otherwise one will express a peer groups distrust and desire to avoid the issue. The bottom line is to study practical, basic, fundemental, primary, ground level technicalities of domestic level to know for sure one is known for sure and this aspect goes far and beyond the experience of the
marriage relationship which is considered by most the most complete education for the poor. From your good friend Bruce K. Paxton
