周日其實傳媒漏了一段小新聞，蕭家在港贏了「雲呢拿」，但原來是贏了越洋孖寶，當日早上蕭氏父子、陳志新(「中華寶貝」馬主)及我一起合夥擁有的「拿高」子嗣「媽閣前地」，在悉尼溫爾贏出二千一百米的賽事。
第六場蕭氏父子、陳志新及我互相祝賀之餘，蕭家有「雲呢拿」及「大威力」，我及陳志新有「多多心得」，互相調侃說，今場包辦三重彩固然好，Ｑ或ＱＰ也不錯，但我們其中一人取勝的話，就完成越洋孖寶，結果應驗。
在馬圈日子耐，朋友無數，但能推心置腹搞合夥的，可能比你中少，但一養起來，就可能是幾匹，其中有不少是配種雌馬，循環不息，而且並不是侷限於一個國家。
見過不少合夥養馬例子，結果搞到朋友都無得做。主要原因是馬兒表現欠佳或部署意見不同，但馬兒好才產生爭拗，近期也見到，屬於罕有。
You are absolutely correct. By supporting a lot (as much as possible)
One can ascertain that one will achieve some kind of relative response depending on how co incidental the responsive data is to the attention. If the optimal supportive motivation is relative to the foundation (wether valid or not) a supportive return will follow.
Accuracy is the issue. This is an hypothetical deduction (not quite as comprehensive as educational requirements are about here in North America) but by any of the individuals motive intelligence. Linguistics and vocabulary play the most important part of communication. Gaps of data in verbal communication only provide confusion.
To express anything at all one must work untill one can say what one means in its entirety otherwise one will express a peer groups distrust and desire to avoid the issue. The bottom line is to study practical, basic, fundemental, primary, ground level technicalities of domestic level to know for sure one is known for sure and this aspect goes far and beyond the experience of the
marriage relationship which is considered by most the most complete education for the poor. From your good friend Bruce K. Paxton
