從歷史角度來看，所謂本土主義其實一直存在，這一如廣東人在六七十年代叫外省人做「老兄」(讀作撈鬆)，叫印巴裔人士做阿星或阿差。這是不是歧視的語句要問平機會，但當年相信是貶獎多於褒獎。
不過像近日到商場見到拉篋客便喝罵的不禮貌舉動，不單是歧視，而且是不文明，令香港這個國際都會蒙羞。
當然香港地少路窄，拉著行李的確佔去不少空間，但酒店或大商場其實也是時候檢討下應否增加儲物設施。而旅行團導遊也可考慮做些教育工作，勸籲團友購物時可先擺好行李，以免妨礙別人。
政府也可與央視合作(又或玩合無線及亞視)，由巨星如劉華或學友等像Ｑ嘜般宣傳，推介良好習慣，善意的叫遊客不要阻路。
以前的社會，見人大包小包，是自動請纓去幫忙，現在則鬧人阻路，香港學校及社區也應宣傳以禮待人之道。還記得當年旅遊發展局的宣傳聲帶和句語，「遊客消費，人人受惠」嗎？
You are absolutely correct. By supporting a lot (as much as possible)
One can ascertain that one will achieve some kind of relative response depending on how co incidental the responsive data is to the attention. If the optimal supportive motivation is relative to the foundation (wether valid or not) a supportive return will follow.
Accuracy is the issue. This is an hypothetical deduction (not quite as comprehensive as educational requirements are about here in North America) but by any of the individuals motive intelligence. Linguistics and vocabulary play the most important part of communication. Gaps of data in verbal communication only provide confusion.
To express anything at all one must work untill one can say what one means in its entirety otherwise one will express a peer groups distrust and desire to avoid the issue. The bottom line is to study practical, basic, fundemental, primary, ground level technicalities of domestic level to know for sure one is known for sure and this aspect goes far and beyond the experience of the
marriage relationship which is considered by most the most complete education for the poor. From your good friend Bruce K. Paxton
