看着亞視將版權和資產逐樣逐樣出售，有點像落魄的豪門變賣家當似的，心裏有點戚戚然。
年青時曾亮相過亞視部分節目，也在廿一世紀初製作賽馬節目在亞視播出，更試過有一年將工作室設在亞視裏。當時仍在廣播道，儘管資源不算充裕，錄影廠也殘舊，但上下一心的精神，是完全感受到。而現時的亞視員工，若非仍有着這種精神加上傳媒專業操守，在目前如此惡劣的營運環境，以及大股東玩嘢的情況下，又怎能支撐到今時今日？
王征打甚麼算盤，要他自己才知。但若要真真正正解決問題，不是靠賣資產就成。老實說，資產有幾多可以賣？大家心中有數，而且愈賣亞視就愈不值錢。
並非無人想做白武士，但尼祿要焚城，崇楨皇要去煤山，無人能阻。對於亞視落入如此精采的人之手，港人只能說句奈何。
You are absolutely correct. By supporting a lot (as much as possible)
One can ascertain that one will achieve some kind of relative response depending on how co incidental the responsive data is to the attention. If the optimal supportive motivation is relative to the foundation (wether valid or not) a supportive return will follow.
Accuracy is the issue. This is an hypothetical deduction (not quite as comprehensive as educational requirements are about here in North America) but by any of the individuals motive intelligence. Linguistics and vocabulary play the most important part of communication. Gaps of data in verbal communication only provide confusion.
To express anything at all one must work untill one can say what one means in its entirety otherwise one will express a peer groups distrust and desire to avoid the issue. The bottom line is to study practical, basic, fundemental, primary, ground level technicalities of domestic level to know for sure one is known for sure and this aspect goes far and beyond the experience of the
marriage relationship which is considered by most the most complete education for the poor. From your good friend Bruce K. Paxton
