收緊自由行政策，對馬圈有無影響，我相信未必很大。
可能入場人數(來自內地的)輕微下跌，但近年的大注，眾所周知均不是現場賭現金，而是透過電腦科技網上注碼。人在不在香港，根本並不重要。
也許我們要承認，隨著科技進步，世界各地博彩也愈來愈電子化，也不在現場。就算在現場，也未必是賭現金，反而是用網上戶口。
有個得意的現象可以與你們分享一下，大家都知道部分馬匹拍賣行都有網上競投設施，可供海外買家買馬，但近年有不少買家就算在現場，也選擇掩人耳目地用電腦競投，避免賣家抬價。
當然有不少馬迷朋友要親身睇定沙圈才決定下注與否，但不少大戶是收料或計數，有時分析比大學研究更為精密。有些大戶當生意來做，下注全用戶口，根本不入場。有部份入場朋友是觀光，有時感受氣氛，更有年青人是為交朋結友呢！
You are absolutely correct. By supporting a lot (as much as possible)
One can ascertain that one will achieve some kind of relative response depending on how co incidental the responsive data is to the attention. If the optimal supportive motivation is relative to the foundation (wether valid or not) a supportive return will follow.
Accuracy is the issue. This is an hypothetical deduction (not quite as comprehensive as educational requirements are about here in North America) but by any of the individuals motive intelligence. Linguistics and vocabulary play the most important part of communication. Gaps of data in verbal communication only provide confusion.
To express anything at all one must work untill one can say what one means in its entirety otherwise one will express a peer groups distrust and desire to avoid the issue. The bottom line is to study practical, basic, fundemental, primary, ground level technicalities of domestic level to know for sure one is known for sure and this aspect goes far and beyond the experience of the
marriage relationship which is considered by most the most complete education for the poor. From your good friend Bruce K. Paxton
