李光耀逝世，其實是國際政治舞台一個階段的總結。
我說的是精英政治的總結，也是強者主導政治的總結。
李先生是華人社會精英中的精英，倫大及劍橋出身，成功的律師，三十五歲就當總理，多年來在政壇叱咤風雲。
但從六十年代起他在新加坡施行的強權政治，不錯可將獅城從低谷中帶向繁榮，但這樣的施政方針如果沿用在廿一世紀，下下用家長管治或手腕去「帶領」人民，是否行得通呢？
現在世界政壇也有不少強人，但對不起，除極權國家外，在自由民主社會，強人是英雄無用武之地的，因為他們未必肯放下身段聆聽人民的要求。他們可能是覺得自己叻過人民，知道
點行，自己一定是對的。但人民是否想高增長，全速發展呢？
可幸他生於亂世，掌權於上世紀。而這種管治手法是上世紀的潮流，所以能名垂青史。
You are absolutely correct. By supporting a lot (as much as possible)
One can ascertain that one will achieve some kind of relative response depending on how co incidental the responsive data is to the attention. If the optimal supportive motivation is relative to the foundation (wether valid or not) a supportive return will follow.
Accuracy is the issue. This is an hypothetical deduction (not quite as comprehensive as educational requirements are about here in North America) but by any of the individuals motive intelligence. Linguistics and vocabulary play the most important part of communication. Gaps of data in verbal communication only provide confusion.
To express anything at all one must work untill one can say what one means in its entirety otherwise one will express a peer groups distrust and desire to avoid the issue. The bottom line is to study practical, basic, fundemental, primary, ground level technicalities of domestic level to know for sure one is known for sure and this aspect goes far and beyond the experience of the
marriage relationship which is considered by most the most complete education for the poor. From your good friend Bruce K. Paxton
