馬會公布中籤名單，雖然亦有初次養馬的娛樂圈人士中籤，但整體而言，都是熟口熟面的居多。
如果大家有留心的話，就知道二萬多馬會會員中，一向只有千多人會入紙，當中更有不少是每年都申請的，所以在數學和統計學上，抽到熟口熟面的，也十分合理。
而今年中籤的內地會員也比過往為少，不知是抽不中，還是因內地整風而不入籤。
收到不少朋友的道賀，他們都是心水清之輩。其實今次我自己並無入籤，因為根據馬會條例，作為團體經理人，是自己申請配額計算，而一位會員只能最多申請兩個配額（自己或團體，又或兩個團體），所以我自己不能獨自申請。還好，這對得住所有團體成員老友，因為兩張團體申請全中，一張是下季的PP，一張是一六／一七馬季的PPG，再加埋自己上季中的PP，未來兩年肯定有三匹馬玩！
吳嵩
You are absolutely correct. By supporting a lot (as much as possible)
One can ascertain that one will achieve some kind of relative response depending on how co incidental the responsive data is to the attention. If the optimal supportive motivation is relative to the foundation (wether valid or not) a supportive return will follow.
Accuracy is the issue. This is an hypothetical deduction (not quite as comprehensive as educational requirements are about here in North America) but by any of the individuals motive intelligence. Linguistics and vocabulary play the most important part of communication. Gaps of data in verbal communication only provide confusion.
To express anything at all one must work untill one can say what one means in its entirety otherwise one will express a peer groups distrust and desire to avoid the issue. The bottom line is to study practical, basic, fundemental, primary, ground level technicalities of domestic level to know for sure one is known for sure and this aspect goes far and beyond the experience of the
marriage relationship which is considered by most the most complete education for the poor. From your good friend Bruce K. Paxton
