多得高科技，讓我們切切實實地比較兩個年代的三冠馬王，等講「美國法老」無敵的朋友死心。
「美國法老」贏三冠，除三關所有對手都不濟外(這從評分可以顯示出來)，最重要的是他贏最尾兩關，都只可能在廿一世紀所發生的戰術有關。對手不濟，自己可以按慢步速，入直路才踩油拋甩。
相反地在過往，哪匹馬唔去到盡，贏到盡，在觀眾面前盡顯霸氣？「秘書處」段段(鑼)命的快速度，前千六米已走一分三十四秒二(「美國法老」是一分三十七秒九九)，入直路拋甩對手鞍上人杜葛仍力騎，結果大勝卅一馬位。在現代，有贏得，都唔會咁盡，咁悅目。
自己生在「秘書處」年代，也在澳洲親睹兩匹電兔前領型氣袋「有型世紀」及「偉祿」，兩者都是喜歡自領十多馬位，有本事你就追！試若二者碰頭，步速快到癲，又如何？一樣各不相讓，咁先好睇！
真正馬王不是靠玩步速，要贏人心，就要靠本身的王者風範。對不起「美國法老」欠奉。我很期待下半年牠撼年長馬時的情況。
You are absolutely correct. By supporting a lot (as much as possible)
One can ascertain that one will achieve some kind of relative response depending on how co incidental the responsive data is to the attention. If the optimal supportive motivation is relative to the foundation (wether valid or not) a supportive return will follow.
Accuracy is the issue. This is an hypothetical deduction (not quite as comprehensive as educational requirements are about here in North America) but by any of the individuals motive intelligence. Linguistics and vocabulary play the most important part of communication. Gaps of data in verbal communication only provide confusion.
To express anything at all one must work untill one can say what one means in its entirety otherwise one will express a peer groups distrust and desire to avoid the issue. The bottom line is to study practical, basic, fundemental, primary, ground level technicalities of domestic level to know for sure one is known for sure and this aspect goes far and beyond the experience of the
marriage relationship which is considered by most the most complete education for the poor. From your good friend Bruce K. Paxton
