澳洲賽制改到不倫不類(二)

2008/02/14 17:17:09 網誌分類: 賽馬

14 Feb

在新南威爾斯省首先是馬口像金字塔型，高分少，低分多，一出報名，所謂六十五分以下的賽事一報就四五十匹，九十幾分的賽事就小貓三四隻；第二是三歲馬夾硬被編入與年長馬競爭的賽事，令馬迷更難Line Up真正水準。墨爾本就較聰明，依然三歲還三歲，四歲以上還四歲以上最多加埋評分在內；昆士蘭省就改都費事改，繼續兩歲還兩歲，三歲還三歲，限贏多少場城市頭馬等等，一於捍衛傳統，東奔上週末的賽事就是這樣，而上周五鷹園的賽事則行班次制，評分？睬你都傻。

咁香港普羅馬迷和評馬人點樣Line Up三省賽事水準？答案是憑你對彼邦賽馬的「真正」認識，而且唔係單睇馬會網上片段就可以也文也武，而是需要長時間(起碼五年)的正統浸淫。

有人會問，有冇咁誇張？答案是絕對難度高，因為澳洲各省山頭主義甚重，連行不行夏令時間也不肯劃一，更遑論評分制？讓我告訴你們，有些省份為方便自己水準被評高，有利出售馬匹及獲從不到澳洲的歐裔人士高估，例如根據澳洲東岸最暢銷馬經，南澳洲城市九十一分賽事等於第六班，也等於西澳洲城市七十九分賽事，而西澳限贏三場城市頭馬的高限是九十分，比南澳贏兩場的九十一分還低，兩省與墨爾本鄉鎮馬場比較，第六班已是八十九分，這是否表示西澳洲第六班馬去墨爾本鄉鎮也不夠跑？好好地有制度，現時改為人治，我無奈！

回應 (0)

我要發表

Bruce K. Paxton 2017/07/16

You are absolutely correct. By supporting a lot (as much as possible)

One can ascertain that one will achieve some kind of relative response depending on how co incidental the responsive data is to the attention. If the optimal supportive motivation is relative to the foundation (wether valid or not) a supportive return will follow.

Accuracy is the issue. This is an hypothetical deduction (not quite as comprehensive as educational requirements are about here in North America) but by any of the individuals motive intelligence. Linguistics and vocabulary play the most important part of communication. Gaps of data in verbal communication only provide confusion.

To express anything at all one must work untill one can say what one means in its entirety otherwise one will express a peer groups distrust and desire to avoid the issue. The bottom line is to study practical, basic, fundemental, primary, ground level technicalities of domestic level to know for sure one is known for sure and this aspect goes far and beyond the experience of the

marriage relationship which is considered by most the most complete education for the poor. From your good friend Bruce K. Paxton

澳洲賽制改到不倫不類(二)

網誌分類

最新網誌

最新回應

月曆