給市民一個公平投注玩法

2008/02/15 18:10:37 網誌分類: 賽馬
15 Feb

 

    澳洲之旅最大收穫不是買到馬或贏多少錢,而是深入瞭解到彼邦投注局的運作。

 

    大家都知道澳洲賽馬和投注是分家的:彼邦馬會、馬車會及狗會各自負責賽制和賽程,而投注局則是獨立的有限公司,負責一切博彩事宜,這包括馬、馬車、狗、世界足球、NBA、高爾夫球,甚至一級方程式賽車等等。投注局在八十年代由彼邦政府擁有,後來還富於民,將部份股權上市,令輸了錢的股東間接在股價上漲或派息中賺回部份(若在定位賠率賽事,投注局是莊家,與投注者是對賭,你輸佢贏,佢盈利自然更多)。當然投注局的盈利要回撥部份給各省馬會運作,又有部份撥予協助及治療病態賭徒,餘下的盈利也要納稅,營運模式近似香港馬會的投注事務部。

 

    但在定位賠率派彩上,香港馬會足智彩就十分保守,以上周澳洲主場對卡塔爾的世界盃預賽,大家都以為在澳洲下注澳洲隊會全世界最熱,但原來開飛有1.37倍,到有球迷熱情支持才下降到1.33倍,不過原來香港幾乎是全世界賠率最低的地方,開飛已是1.22倍,比澳洲派少百分之五十!我以為是單一事件,但電視拍檔績王告訴我香港有部份場次是全世界最熱的,但足智彩是獨市,市民無選擇權。因為獨市是香港的經營模式,我也不贊成民政事務局發超過一個牌,也不認為引入競爭可以解決問題(其實能衍生更多問題),不過馬會投注部在固守盈利率不下跌以維持慈善捐獻及交稅之餘,也應顧及掌握資訊的市民感受,給他們一個公平的投注環境。

回應 (0)
我要發表
user

最新回應

Bruce K. Paxton
Bruce K. Paxton 2017/07/16

You are absolutely correct. By supporting a lot (as much as possible)

One can ascertain that one will achieve some kind of relative response depending on how co incidental the responsive data is to the attention. If the optimal supportive motivation is relative to the foundation (wether valid or not) a supportive return will follow.

Accuracy is the issue. This is an hypothetical deduction (not quite as comprehensive as educational requirements are about here in North America) but by any of the individuals motive intelligence. Linguistics and vocabulary play the most important part of communication. Gaps of data in verbal communication only provide confusion.

To express anything at all one must work untill one can say what one means in its entirety otherwise       one   will express a peer groups distrust and desire to avoid the issue. The bottom line is to study practical, basic, fundemental, primary, ground level technicalities of domestic level to know for sure   one    is known for sure   and this aspect goes far and beyond the experience of the

 marriage relationship  which is considered by most the most complete education for the poor.    From your good friend Bruce K. Paxton