尊重先人

2009/06/08 18:14:42 網誌分類: 其他
08 Jun

有報道謂影后林黛之子在林黛死後一直保存不少影后珍貴的遺物,早前全捐予電影博物館。

近日影圈及球圈都有巨星離世,固然要尊重其後人低調的作風,但石堅及林尚義的後人,又可否考慮將這兩位在其專業圈子裏出人頭地,飲譽全港的高人有收藏價值的遺物,公諸世人呢?

近年藝人、球圈甚至馬圈已少了子承父業,甚至不少名人之後是專業人仕。但要表揚對名人在其圈子中的專業成就,絕對需要有真實和珍貴的資料史跡。

華佗高明的醫學典籍,結果被其妻子燒去,中華醫術就此失去不少回春的妙技;二十世紀末有個實例,某馬圈工作者擁有數十年極之珍貴的賽馬照片,卻與當時某些主政人仕達不到共識,他又年紀老邁後繼無人,所以據聞他是將這些照片和底片全部燒光。可惜當時我仍未收購「賽馬天下」,這位老人家又無向其他人仕求售,否則這些歷史可能已得到妥善保存。

寄語名人之後就算不繼承父業,也應尊重其地位;英國名賽馬作家Dick Francis,其子不是作家,卻協助父親管理業務和拓展市場。他告知我他幫父親的原因是尊重父親在業界的地位。願天下人子共勉之。

回應 (0)
我要發表
user

最新回應

Bruce K. Paxton
Bruce K. Paxton 2017/07/16

You are absolutely correct. By supporting a lot (as much as possible)

One can ascertain that one will achieve some kind of relative response depending on how co incidental the responsive data is to the attention. If the optimal supportive motivation is relative to the foundation (wether valid or not) a supportive return will follow.

Accuracy is the issue. This is an hypothetical deduction (not quite as comprehensive as educational requirements are about here in North America) but by any of the individuals motive intelligence. Linguistics and vocabulary play the most important part of communication. Gaps of data in verbal communication only provide confusion.

To express anything at all one must work untill one can say what one means in its entirety otherwise       one   will express a peer groups distrust and desire to avoid the issue. The bottom line is to study practical, basic, fundemental, primary, ground level technicalities of domestic level to know for sure   one    is known for sure   and this aspect goes far and beyond the experience of the

 marriage relationship  which is considered by most the most complete education for the poor.    From your good friend Bruce K. Paxton