給學校繼續「教學」
2009/12/04 08:46:52
網誌分類:
生活
跟朋友討論到這問題，被反問到有沒有其他更好的方法去處理青少年的濫藥及吸毒問題。老實說，我對這個社會問題認識不深，不清楚事情變壞的程度，但青少年接觸毒品，與吸煙和飲酒又有何大分別呢？因為我們覺得毒品損害身體健康、會形成毒癮？是否因為一個「毒」字，就以為是很壞，就一定要急於解決這個問題？
若果我們將煙酒的名稱變為「毒煙」和「毒酒」，大家對這兩個問題的注意力可能會多一點，因為這樣凸顯了酒的禍害，例如酒也能亂性。所以，為甚麼在校園只要求驗毒，不去檢驗學生有否吸煙和飲酒呢？
學校是一個「教學」的地方，不是「管教」的地方。「教學」和「管教」最大的分別是，「教學」包含知識傳送和人性品格培養；「管教」是羈留所和更生中心的責任。「教」是培訓，就像種子放在泥土裏，沒有限制地任由種子發芽成長；「管」則帶有管束、規範的意味。
學校是否應該反思自己的角色呢？有小朋友告訴我，他不喜歡他的學校和老師，因為他試過在上課時遇到問題，下課時請教老師，而老師竟然二話不說就怪責那位小朋友上課時沒有留心，只顧和隔鄰小朋友談玩，才聽不清楚老師的說話。
這是「教」還是「管」呢？老師是應該「教」小朋友不可以吸煙、飲酒和吸毒，而根本不需要知道那位同學有做過這樣的事。為甚麼要在校園內做測試呢？既然同學願意簽同意書，自願進行驗毒，家長又覺得有需要的話，為甚麼不能在家中做測試呢？這不是更能保障同學的私隱嗎？警察的法定職責是阻止罪案發生和拘捕罪犯，是否可以知情不「捕」呢？
對於部份學校支持「校園驗毒計劃」感到傷感，因為這是一個絕對的錯誤，學校的角色已經開始動搖，他們不再是「教」，而是「管」學生。學校是否仍是一個培育青年的地方呢？他們的價值是甚麼呢？
我在此呼籲各位家長，不要簽署驗毒同意書。
王維基
同意。文中提及有關學校老師的指控，亦時有所聞。
現今，一個以功利為主導的社會，學生的質素常被質疑，學生的優劣均以學業成績為指標，德行的重要性往往被忽略。但我認為「學校」不單只是培訓學生的地方，老師的責任亦不只是「教學」，學校是作育英才的地方。
我認為老師在傳授知識的同時，亦應教導學生道德品行，修身做人的道理，認清做人的價值，教導他們成為一個誠實守規，承擔負責的人。 若凡事只從狹隘的個人利益出發，有才無德；那麼，現有社會的畸形現象，浮誇的現狀，將會繼續惡化蔓延，不會改變。
而且「真金不怕洪爐火」，那怕要驗證多少次！
Hello i am currently a student of F.7.
Concerning this issue, there are some points i cannot agree with you!
I agree with you that the effects of drug-abuse are somehow the same as smoking or drinking and it's shocking that the plan is just concerning drugs but others.
However, you don't agree the the anti-drugs plan because you think schools are places to 'TEACH' but not to 'CONTROL'. From my point of view, if someone don't concentrate during lessons and teachers don't blame him and indicate what he has done wrong, but just teach him, the student absolutle cannot learn what he should do during lessons. Same here in schools, if we just let them grow in no limits, as you mentioned, although they can be inspired by the moral education but they may not get those points or have the same view of the what the teachers taught. Thus controlling them can assist the problem, can teach them BETTER.
In this ever-growing society, youth are always tempted by a lot of things and that's why drug-abuse being a widely-debated problem. Schools play a very important role on students' growth and if we don't control but just to teach, perhaps it is a correct way for those who are smart like you.
I don't agree with this reducdant plan also. There would not be significant effects by this plan. To directly CONTROL this problem, education is ultimately the resort. I suggest the education bureau should strictly launch a system that all schools in HK should have some lessons of Moral education, in which they are independent of other academic subjects. Through this programme, teachers can observe the students' behavious during those lessons and when they find students' strange acts, they can better TEACH and CONTROL them. It must be better than checking them, as in term of significance, students can continue drug-abuse after checking but just stop for a period. Besides, problem of conservation of privacy can be avoided.
More than that, the government should keep close contact to STUDENTS, but not only to SCHOOLS, because i believe a majority of schools' officals doesn't get the same view of that of students. Students are future talents and what they think is very important for their growth, for their future and more importantly, for the government to monitor them well.
There, are all my views on this issue. Thanks!