當你去被公認為攔截粗野的地方踢波，你會否摒棄自己一貫斯文風格，與他們在球場上大打「全武行」？
除美國之外，利尿劑是的全球賽馬禁藥，身為有原則、有見地的馬圈中人，就如香港馬會以至馬房上下，就算有馬匹遠征美國，也不會使用禁藥。一如你去阿姆斯特丹，縱使知道大麻在當地合法，你會去吸食嗎？
有求勝心切之人，可能認為在美國不用利尿劑等於讓半臂，這點我不苟同，我們一樣見過歐洲馬在育馬者盃不用利尿劑而取勝。
「好好計」團隊今次是君子之爭，也堅持國際認可的原則，無理由一個地方打茅波，你就要陪佢茅。而大家都知道部分禁藥一如毒品，用開就不能斷癮，一停用身體就隨時出毛病，為馬兒長遠前途着想，馬房上下是不會犯險的。
只要馬兒質素勝過對手，無論用藥與否，一樣夠贏。所以今次成敗主要是睇對手，而不是睇藥。
You are absolutely correct. By supporting a lot (as much as possible)
One can ascertain that one will achieve some kind of relative response depending on how co incidental the responsive data is to the attention. If the optimal supportive motivation is relative to the foundation (wether valid or not) a supportive return will follow.
Accuracy is the issue. This is an hypothetical deduction (not quite as comprehensive as educational requirements are about here in North America) but by any of the individuals motive intelligence. Linguistics and vocabulary play the most important part of communication. Gaps of data in verbal communication only provide confusion.
To express anything at all one must work untill one can say what one means in its entirety otherwise one will express a peer groups distrust and desire to avoid the issue. The bottom line is to study practical, basic, fundemental, primary, ground level technicalities of domestic level to know for sure one is known for sure and this aspect goes far and beyond the experience of the
marriage relationship which is considered by most the most complete education for the poor. From your good friend Bruce K. Paxton
