體育無經濟貢獻？有無搞錯？
大家看一看Rugby Seven在國際間所掀起的震撼，有邊個敢在欖總面前講佢對香港無經濟貢獻？
大家看看當年皇馬或曼聯訪港，不單只是入場人數，而是球星去到邊度，邊度就有粉絲。而他們在港的消費，絕對少不到那裏。
在外國，賽馬是體育界的；它帶來的稅收，堪稱冠絕全港，又怎能說無經濟貢獻呢？
特首此言差矣，難怪被體育界以致整個社會狂轟。
我知道近期「佔鐘」及「佔旺」事件令他疲於奔命，但思路也不致如此不清晰。
體育是全世界也重視的項目，充滿商機，充滿動感，對世界任何地方，也有經濟貢獻。一個世界足球先生韋亞，就令全世界知道利比里亞在那裏。一個NBA就令全美趨之若鶩。
特首請收回言論！
You are absolutely correct. By supporting a lot (as much as possible)
One can ascertain that one will achieve some kind of relative response depending on how co incidental the responsive data is to the attention. If the optimal supportive motivation is relative to the foundation (wether valid or not) a supportive return will follow.
Accuracy is the issue. This is an hypothetical deduction (not quite as comprehensive as educational requirements are about here in North America) but by any of the individuals motive intelligence. Linguistics and vocabulary play the most important part of communication. Gaps of data in verbal communication only provide confusion.
To express anything at all one must work untill one can say what one means in its entirety otherwise one will express a peer groups distrust and desire to avoid the issue. The bottom line is to study practical, basic, fundemental, primary, ground level technicalities of domestic level to know for sure one is known for sure and this aspect goes far and beyond the experience of the
marriage relationship which is considered by most the most complete education for the poor. From your good friend Bruce K. Paxton
