近年有頗多血統全無商業價值的馬匹運港。
其中有部分連主流周歲拍賣會也無法躋身，也有部分連十萬港元周歲價也不到。
不要誤會我說血統就主宰實力，有部份血統好到無得頂的馬連跑也不懂跑。我要說的是這些ＰＰ或ＰＰＧ的，倘若不是試閘或出賽有過表現，根本難獲彼邦代理垂青，然後推薦售港。
八九十年代，曾幾何時香港出現過一批馬主，對血統優良馬匹趨之若鶩。不少更認為倘若表現好贏出級制賽，便有配種價值。我們見過一代種王「尼真斯基」的子嗣如「安駿」「駕勢」等來港，也有葉森打吡盟主「莎莉高原」的子嗣「萬里飛」及「一心一意」等以ＰＰ姿態抵港。
當然這幾匹馬都被閹，做不成種馬，但都能躋身高班。香港第一匹真正級際佳駟而能獲大牧場垂青取代，應是打吡盟主「幸運馬主」。其餘「丹山飛駒」「凱明神駒」等也是血統一流，就算競賽成就只到三級左右，仍有不少贏馬子嗣出產。
You are absolutely correct. By supporting a lot (as much as possible)
One can ascertain that one will achieve some kind of relative response depending on how co incidental the responsive data is to the attention. If the optimal supportive motivation is relative to the foundation (wether valid or not) a supportive return will follow.
Accuracy is the issue. This is an hypothetical deduction (not quite as comprehensive as educational requirements are about here in North America) but by any of the individuals motive intelligence. Linguistics and vocabulary play the most important part of communication. Gaps of data in verbal communication only provide confusion.
To express anything at all one must work untill one can say what one means in its entirety otherwise one will express a peer groups distrust and desire to avoid the issue. The bottom line is to study practical, basic, fundemental, primary, ground level technicalities of domestic level to know for sure one is known for sure and this aspect goes far and beyond the experience of the
marriage relationship which is considered by most the most complete education for the poor. From your good friend Bruce K. Paxton
