話咁快又過年，跑完週日下周三無戰事，要到年初三才跑賀歲馬，然後初七跑夜馬。
正因西邊無戰事，下週我會離港渡歲。機位緊張之餘，我們一家三口兵分三路，在新加坡才會師，過一個南洋假期。
老實說馬年對香港實在鬱悶，政不道，人不和，而且有變本加厲之勢。但羊年代表平和，火氣不再猛，我也問過高人，香港運氣未用完，二零一五無論在各方面也有轉機，但要站高一點看事物，而看事物時也應用不同角度。
其實在二月澳洲之旅我已擬定好未來五年計劃，內容當然不便透露之餘，我也可告訴各位部份與賽馬是風馬牛不相及。如果大家到了我五十多之齡仍然介懷一場馬的得失或贏條單Ｑ就沾沾自喜，我相信這不會我心目中的美好人生。現在我贏也哈哈，輸也哈哈，自己員工也不可能知道我當天的上落，這似乎與佛家的戒嗔二字，又接近了一步。
You are absolutely correct. By supporting a lot (as much as possible)
One can ascertain that one will achieve some kind of relative response depending on how co incidental the responsive data is to the attention. If the optimal supportive motivation is relative to the foundation (wether valid or not) a supportive return will follow.
Accuracy is the issue. This is an hypothetical deduction (not quite as comprehensive as educational requirements are about here in North America) but by any of the individuals motive intelligence. Linguistics and vocabulary play the most important part of communication. Gaps of data in verbal communication only provide confusion.
To express anything at all one must work untill one can say what one means in its entirety otherwise one will express a peer groups distrust and desire to avoid the issue. The bottom line is to study practical, basic, fundemental, primary, ground level technicalities of domestic level to know for sure one is known for sure and this aspect goes far and beyond the experience of the
marriage relationship which is considered by most the most complete education for the poor. From your good friend Bruce K. Paxton
