今年我選擇在新加坡過年，其實已超過五年無去過，知道他們把握發展機遇，飛黃騰達。
去探探新加坡賽馬公會的好友之餘，也要看看他們的景點及旅遊熱點的款客之道。
當我們停滯不前，又有個別激進分子去趕客，別人一定會乘虛而入。新加坡就藉著強勢政府以及上下一心的精神，大力發展經濟。
新年在港的話人頭湧湧，在新加坡相信也會熱鬧，但相信也更有秩序；而新加坡跑馬，儘管未必像香港般佳餚美酒，但南洋風味，也與別不同。
因要趕回港看初三賽事，不會去主題樂園了。反而新加坡的牛車水，估計氣氛是熾熱的。
其實南洋地方，我最想去檳城，但航機時間不夾，去年欲計劃時也剛好遇上馬航事件，以致作罷。但這個地方的娘惹文化卻是保留得最深厚，對我這熱愛南洋歷史的人是絕不能錯的。
You are absolutely correct. By supporting a lot (as much as possible)
One can ascertain that one will achieve some kind of relative response depending on how co incidental the responsive data is to the attention. If the optimal supportive motivation is relative to the foundation (wether valid or not) a supportive return will follow.
Accuracy is the issue. This is an hypothetical deduction (not quite as comprehensive as educational requirements are about here in North America) but by any of the individuals motive intelligence. Linguistics and vocabulary play the most important part of communication. Gaps of data in verbal communication only provide confusion.
To express anything at all one must work untill one can say what one means in its entirety otherwise one will express a peer groups distrust and desire to avoid the issue. The bottom line is to study practical, basic, fundemental, primary, ground level technicalities of domestic level to know for sure one is known for sure and this aspect goes far and beyond the experience of the
marriage relationship which is considered by most the most complete education for the poor. From your good friend Bruce K. Paxton
